Hardy, Anna Corella2015-02-042015-02-042015-02-03vt_gsexam:4271http://hdl.handle.net/10919/51252The Charleston earthquake of 1886 was one of the largest shocks to occur on the eastern coast of North America. The geological cause has long been a controversial issue and a variety of source models have been proposed. Previous potential field modeling and reinterpretation of seismic reflection and well data collected in the early 1980s indicate that the crust between approximately 1 and 4.5 km depth is comprised primarily of Mesozoic mafic rocks, with extensive faulting that is spatially coincident with modern seismicity in the epicentral area (Chapman and Beale, 2010). This thesis proposes a new and testable hypothesis concerning the fault source of the 1886 shock that is very different from all previous interpretations. It is based on data collected during 2011-2012 from a local seismic network deployment in the immediate epicentral area. The 8-station temporary network was designed to better constrain earthquake hypocenter locations and focal mechanisms. Hypocenter locations of 134 earthquakes indicate a south-striking, west-dipping seismogenic zone in the upper 12 km of the crust. Over 40% of the 66 well-constrained focal mechanisms show reverse faulting on approximately north-south trending nodal planes, consistent with the orientation of the tabular hypocenter distribution. I offer the following hypothesis: The 1886 shock occurred by compressional reactivation of a major, south-striking, west-dipping early Mesozoic extensional fault. The modern seismicity can be regarded as a long-term aftershock sequence that is outlining the 1886 damage zone. Variability of shallow focal mechanisms is due to the complex early Mesozoic fault structure in the upper 4-5 km.ETDIn Copyrightearthquakesseismicityseismic hazardSouth CarolinaThesis