Scavone Lasalle, Martin2022-08-242022-08-242022-08-23vt_gsexam:35394http://hdl.handle.net/10919/111606The latest trends in highway pavement management aim at implementing a rational, data-driven procedure to allocate resources for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation. To this end, decision-making is based on network-wide surface condition and structural capacity data – preferably collected in a non-destructive manner such as a deflection testing device. This more holistic approach was proven to be more cost-effective than the current state of the art, in which the pavement manager grounds their maintenance and rehabilitation-related decision making on surface distress measurements. However, pavement practitioners still rely mostly on surface distress because traditional deflection measuring devices are not practical for network-level data collection. Traffic-speed deflection devices, among which the Traffic Speed Deflectometer [TSD], allow measuring pavement surface deflections at travel speeds as high as 95 km/h [60 miles per hour], and reporting the said measurements with a spatial resolution as dense as 5cm [2 inches] between consecutive measurements. Since their inception in the early 2000s, and mostly over the past 15 years, numerous research efforts and trial tests focused on the interpretation of the deflection data collected by the TSD, its validity as a field testing device, and its comparability against the staple pavement deflection testing device – the Falling Weight Deflectometer [FWD]. The research efforts have concluded that although different in nature than the FWD, the TSD does furnish valid deflection measurements, from which the pavement structural health can be assessed. Most published TSD-related literature focused on TSD surveys of flexible pavement networks and the estimation of structural health indicators for hot-mix asphalt pavement structures from the resulting data – a sensible approach given that the majority of the US paved road pavement network is asphalt. Meanwhile, concrete and composite pavements (a minority of the US pavement network that yet accounts for nearly half of the US Interstate System) have been mostly neglected in TSD-related research, even though the TSD has been deemed a suitable device for sourcing deflection data from which to infer the structural health of the pavement slabs and the load-carrying joints. Thus, this Dissertation's main objective is to fulfill this gap in knowledge, providing the pavement manager/practitioner with a streamlined, comprehensive interpretation procedure to turn dense TSD deflection measurements collected at a jointed pavement network into characterization parameters and structural health metrics for both the concrete slab system, the sub-grade material, and the load-carrying joints. The proposed TSD data analysis procedure spans over two stages: Data extraction and interpretation. The Data Extraction Stage applies a Lasso-based regularization scheme [Basis Pursuit coupled with Reweighted L1 Minimization] to simultaneously remove the white noise from the TSD deflection measurements and extract the deflection response generated as the TSD travels over the pavement's transverse joints. The examples presented demonstrate that this technique can actually pinpoint the location of structurally weak spots within the pavement network from the network-wide TSD measurements, such as deteriorated transverse joints or segments with early stages of fatigue damage, worthy of further investigation and/or structural overhaul. Meanwhile, the Interpretation Stage implements a linear-elastic jointed-slab-on-ground mathematical model to back-calculate the concrete pavement's and subgrade's stiffness and the transverse joints' load transfer efficiency index [LTE] from the denoised TSD measurements. In this Dissertation, the performance of this back-calculation technique is analyzed with actual TSD data collected at a 5-cm resolution at the MnROAD test track, for which material properties results and FWD-based deflection test results at select transverse joints are available. However, during an early exploratory analysis of the available 5-cm data, a discrepancy between the reported deflection slope and velocity data and simulated measurements was found: The simulated deflection slopes mismatch the observations for measurements collected nearby the transverse joints whereas the measured and simulated deflection velocities are in agreement. Such a finding prompted a revision of the well-known direct relationship between TSD-based deflection velocity and slope data, concluding that it only holds on very specific cases, and that a jointed pavement is a case in which deflection velocity and slope do not correlate directly. As a consequence, the back-calculation approach to the pavement properties and the joints' LTE index was implemented with the TSD's deflection velocity data as input. Validation results of the back-calculation tool using TSD data from the MnROAD low volume road showed a reasonable agreement with the comparison data available while at the same time providing an LTE estimate for all the transverse joints (including those for which FWD-based deflection data is unavailable), suggesting that the proposed data analysis technique is practical for corridor-wide screening. In summary, this Dissertation presents a streamlined TSD data extraction and interpretation technique that can (1) highlight the location of structurally deficient joints within a jointed pavement corridor worthy of further investigation with an FWD and/or localized repair, thus optimizing the time the FWD spends on the road; and 2) reasonably estimate the structural parameters of a concrete pavement structure, its sub-grade, and the transverse joints, thus providing valuable data both for inventory-keeping and rehabilitation management.ETDenCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 InternationalTSDconcretepavementjointsmanagementbig-dataDissertation