Meyer, C. A.2016-04-192016-04-191996Development and Change 27(3): 453-4740012-155Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/66295Metadata only recordNGO's are linked to environmental objectives for good reason: non-profit NGO's provide a flexible, private-sector answer to the provision of international environmental public goods. The non-profit sector can link for profit, non-profit, and public-sector objectives in complex contracts. This article examines how, for the case of the National Biodiversity Institute (INBio) in Costa Rica, such complex contracts with both domestic and international parties provide partial solutions to public goods problems in the absence of private property rights over genetic resources. INBio's 'monopoly' position, legitimized by the local government, brings in rents from genetic resources which are reinvested in the production of public goods.text/plainen-USIn CopyrightBiodiversityNongovernmental organizations (NGOs)InstitutionsNon-profit organizationsProperty rightsCosta RicaPublic goodsEcosystemAbstractCopyright 1996 Institute of Social Studies