Beardsley, Colton Tack2020-06-242020-06-242020-06-23vt_gsexam:26773http://hdl.handle.net/10919/99091Computational fluid dynamics methods have seen an increasing role in aerodynamic analysis since their first implementation. However, there are several major limitations is these methods of analysis, especially in the area of modeling separated flow. There exists a large demand for high-fidelity experimental data for turbulence modeling validation. Virginia Tech has joined NASA in a cooperative project to design and perform an experiment in the Virginia Tech Stability Wind Tunnel with the purpose of providing a benchmark set of data for the turbulence modeling community for the flow over a three-dimensional bump. This process requires thorough risk mitigation and analysis of potential flow sensitivities. The current study investigates several aspects of the experimental design through the use of several computational fluid dynamics codes. An emphasis is given to boundary condition matching and uncertainty quantification, as well as sensitivities of the flow features to Reynolds number and inflow conditions. Solutions are computed for two different RANS turbulence models, using two different finite-volume CFD codes. Boundary layer inflow parameters are studied as well as pressure and skin friction distribution on the bump surface. The shape and extent of separation are compared for the various solutions. Pressure distributions are compared to available experimental data for two different Reynolds numbers.ETDIn CopyrightAerodynamicsTurbulence ModelingComputational fluid dynamicsValidation ExperimentsThesis