Nicholls, H.2016-04-192016-04-192004PLoS Biology 2(9): e3101544-91731545-78852493_Nicholls2004_The_conservation_business.pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/66994The language of conservation is changing: protecting biodiversity is no longer just about ethics and aesthetics; the latest buzzwords are commodities and consumers. Traditionally, conservation initiatives have talked up the benefits they will bring to the global community-saving species, habitats, ecosystems, and ultimately the planet. But conservation also has its costs, and these are usually borne by local people prevented from exploiting the resources around them in other ways. It is unfair to expect a localised minority to pick up costs that ultimately benefit a dispersed majority, argue conservation biologists. There has to be more money made available by concerned individuals, non-governmental organisations, national governments, and international bodies, and there need to be better ways to spend this money if conservation is to be effective, they say. Biodiversity is a commodity that can be bought and sold. We are consumers and must pay. (Excerpt from article)application/pdfen-USCopyright 2004 Henry Nicholls. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, if the original work is properly citedBiodiversityEconomic analysesPayments for environmental servicesEcotourismConservation strategyConservationConservation incentivesBiodiversity conservationPESPsa (programa de pago de servicios ambientales)Direct approachIndirect conservation approachDirect paymentsArticle - Refereedhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020310