El Ghoul, SadokGuedhami, OmraneMansi, Sattar A.Yoon, Hyo Jin2023-01-052023-01-052020-01-150025-1909http://hdl.handle.net/10919/113049Using Kempf, Manconi, and Spalt’s (2017) measure of shareholder inattention, constructed from exogenous industry shocks to institutional investor portfolios, we find that firms with distracted shareholders are associated with a higher cost of debt. This effect is stronger for firms with more powerful CEOs, higher information asymmetry, and those operating in less competitive product markets. Further testing suggests that the inattention–cost of debt relation is driven primarily by dual holders directly observing shareholder distraction. Our results are robust to controlling for inattention at the retail investor level and to other external monitors, including credit rating agencies, financial analysts, and Big 4 auditors. Overall, our evidence suggests that institutional shareholder inattention has an incrementally negative effect on bond pricing.application/pdfenIn CopyrightAgency ConflictsBondholder–Shareholder ConflictCost of DebtInattentionArticle - Refereed2023-01-03Mansi, Sattar [0000-0001-7098-7996]