Bracer, C.Scherr, Sara J.Molnar, A.Sekher, M.Ochieng, B. O.Sriskanthan, G.2016-04-192016-04-192007CES Scoping Study Issue Paper No. 4. ICRAF Working Paper No. 394141_Bracer2007_Organization_pro_poor_CES.pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/68392The purpose of this paper is to assess the requirements, current state and key issues related to organization and governance in the compensation and reward for ecosystem services (CRES) needed to achieve pro-poor outcomes. It reviews the institutional evolution of CRES both conceptually and in practice, and presents a broad view of the many governance, legal and political economy related aspects of CRES.application/pdfen-USCopyright World Agroforestry Centre 2007. Articles appearing in this publication may be quoted or reproduced without charge, provided the source is acknowledged.Environmental servicesPayments for environmental servicesPovertyGovernmentPESLatin americaEcosystem servicesBoliviaBrazilColombiaCosta RicaEcuadorMexicoPerúCompensation and rewards for environmental services (cres)Pro-poor institution buildingPro-poor cresFarm/Enterprise Scale GovernanceTechnical report