Williams, Neville Farley2014-03-142014-03-142010-10-15etd-10292010-112852http://hdl.handle.net/10919/45327The current study employed an ABA design with a control group to assess the effectiveness of a commitment strategy in reducing meat consumption among university students (n=70). Participants who were randomly assigned to the commitment condition did not consume significantly less meat than participants in the control group, t (48)=.74, p=.47. 79% (n=19) of participants in the control group decreased their meat consumption from baseline to treatment phase, compared with 96% (n=27) of participants in the treatment group. Additionally, when both groups were collapsed, all participants reduced meat consumption from baseline to treatment phase t (51)=8.6, p<.001. Participants' scores on the Motivation Towards the Environment Scale, a measure of self-determined motivation towards environmental behavior, were not significant predictors of meat consumption behavior before or during the intervention, t(67)= -.26, p=.80, t(51)=.53, p=.60. Implications and directions for future research are discussed within the paper.In Copyrightenvironmental behaviorbehavior changemeat consumptioncommitmentPromoting a Reduction in Meat Consumption: An Initial Study on the Efficacy of a Commitment StrategyThesishttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-10292010-112852/