Bush, SarahSeibel, Megan M.Niewoehner-Green, JeraRodriguez, Mary2022-01-212022-01-212021-06-30http://hdl.handle.net/10919/107846Leading and managing change through complex problem solving is an integral part of higher education. Yet, appropriately assessing and understanding one another through this work is difficult. Kirton’s Adaption-Innovation (A-I) theory explains problem-solving preferences; namely how people generate ideas, perceive and engage with structures in order to implement ideas, and respond to rules and group norms differently. While there is a dearth of literature related specifically to gender and problem-solving style preference, the environment assuredly influences behavior. Gendered expectations may warrant a behavioral response that is the result of coping to fit, rather than an exhibition of true preference. It is conjectured that genderinfluenced workforce behavior, if at a gap from preferred method of implementing change, can result in poor person-organization (P-O) fit and may adversely impact the success and retention of women in higher education. In this round table, we will explore how problem-solving style impacts the perceptions of women and how those perceptions impact their experiences in higher education. Understanding differences in preferred problem-solving styles can lead to an environment where problem-solving diversity is appreciated (Kirton, 2011). Further, as leadership educators, we can better understand methods for providing training and workshops that fully embrace preferred problem-solving styles and cognitive diversity in breaking down barriers of women’s success in higher education.Pages 368-3736 page(s)application/pdfenIn CopyrightConference proceeding2022-01-21Seibel, Megan [0000-0003-1287-316X]