Baldwin, Quentin Tramond2024-06-112024-06-112024-06-10vt_gsexam:39716https://hdl.handle.net/10919/119379Diversity is a multi-billion-dollar business. Dating back to the pre-Civil Rights era, what scholars now call discursive strategy–the language and meaning that shape phenomena–has shaped the diversity landscape. Over the past 75 years, we have witnessed a pattern of strategic maneuvering of the discursive strategy concerning diversity from the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) of the 1970s to affirmative action (1980s) to diversity management (1990s) to inclusiveness (2000s) and most recently to Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG). However, in response to reactions from its stakeholders, firms, e.g., Bud Light and Target have been forced to rethink the word choices, and subsequent actions, that reflect its attention to diversity. To frame these issues for strategy research, I propose that firms expand their strategies to include discursive diversity strategy, which I define as word choices among top leadership that reflect the firm's attention to diversity, equity, and inclusion.ETDenIn CopyrightDiscursive Diversity StrategyBoard Gender DiversityEmployee Perceptions of Diversity ClimateTobin's QDiscursive Diversity Strategy:  Signaling Theory and Implications for Firm ValueDissertation