Estabrooks, Paul A.You, WenHedrick, Valisa E.Reinholt, MargaretDohm, ErinZoellner, Jamie M.2018-01-102018-01-102017-01-191479-5868http://hdl.handle.net/10919/81682Background: A primary challenge for behavior change strategies is ensuring that interventions can be effective while also attracting a broad and representative sample of the target population. The purpose of this case-study was to report on (1) the reach of a randomized controlled trial targeting reduced sugary beverages, (2) potential participant characteristic differences based on active versus passive recruitment strategies, and (3) recruitment strategy cost. Methods: Demographic and recruitment information was obtained for 8 counties and for individuals screened for participation. Personnel activities and time were tracked. Costs were calculated and compared by active versus passive recruitment. Results: Six-hundred and twenty, of 1,056 screened, individuals were eligible and 301enrolled (77% women; 90% white; mean income $21,981 ± 16,443). Eighty-two and 44% of those responding to passive and active methods, respectively, enrolled in the trial. However, active recruitment strategies yielded considerably more enrolled (active = 199; passive = 102) individuals. Passive recruitment strategies yielded a less representative sample in terms of gender (more women), education (higher), and income (higher; p’s < 0.05). The average cost of an actively recruited and enrolled participant was $278 compared to $117 for a passively recruited and enrolled participant. Conclusions: Though passive recruitment is more cost efficient it may reduce the reach of sugary drink reduction strategies in lower educated and economic residents in rural communities.10 pagesapplication/pdfenCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalNutrition & DieteticsPhysiologyBeveragesBehavioral researchRandomized controlled trialRural populationReachRepresentativenessSUGAR-SWEETENED BEVERAGESRE-AIM FRAMEWORKBASE-LINE CHARACTERISTICSPHYSICAL-ACTIVITYPRIMARY-CARECANCER PREVENTIONDIABETES-MELLITUSPROMOTION PROGRAMWEIGHT-GAININTERVENTIONSArticle - RefereedThe Author(s)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0462-614You, W [0000-0003-3240-6526]