Patton, Lydia K.2023-12-112023-12-112023-12-011220-5400https://hdl.handle.net/10919/117178Does Kuhn’s thesis that successive paradigms are incommensurable necessarily entail denying that the same evidence can be employed under successive paradigms? In this paper, I will argue no. In supporting that conclusion, I will argue for an even stronger point: Kuhn must be committed to the claim that the same evidence can be employed across paradigms, or his account of anomalies makes no sense.Pages 211-225application/pdfenCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalArticle - Refereed672Patton, Lydia [0000-0003-2751-1196]