You, WenAlmeida, Fabio A.Zoellner, Jamie M.Hill, Jennie L.Pinard, Courtney A.Allen, Kacie C.Glasgow, Russell E.Linnan, Laura A.Estabrooks, Paul A.2012-08-242012-08-242011-09-20BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep 20;11(1):709http://hdl.handle.net/10919/18790Background The reach and representativeness are seldom examined in worksite weight loss studies. This paper describes and illustrates a method for directly assessing the reach and representativeness of a internet-based worksite weight loss program. Methods A brief health survey (BHS) was administered, between January 2008 and November 2009, to employees at 19 worksites in Southwest Virginia. The BHS included demographic, behavioral, and health questions. All employees were blinded to the existence of a future weight loss program until the completion of the BHS. Results The BHS has a participation rate of 66 percent and the subsequent weight loss program has a participation rate of 30 percent. Employees from higher income households, with higher education levels and health literacy proficiency were significantly more likely to participate in the program (p's < .01). Conclusions Worksite weight loss programs should include targeted marketing strategies to engage employees with lower income, education, and health literacy.application/pdfenCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalWho Participates in Internet-Based Worksite Weight Loss Programs?Article - Refereed2012-08-24Wen You et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.BMC Public Healthhttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-709