Täuber, Uwe C.Frey, E.2016-10-022016-10-021995-061063-651Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/73154We explain why we feel the objections raised in the preceding Comment do not apply. We also take the opportunity to further clarify our renormalization scheme and the physical and conceptual differences appearing in the cases d > 2 and d ≥ 2, respectively, where d is the substrate dimension. Furthermore, we link our calculations to recent progress within the framework of the directed-polymer representation [M. Lassig (unpublished)], by which our results are confirmed on considerably more general grounds.6319 - 6322 page(s)In CopyrightArticle - RefereedThe American Physical Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.6319516