Virginia Tech. Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringE-A-R/Aearo CompanyNational Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthBehar Noise ControlAluminum Company of AmericaU.S. Army Aeromedical Research LaboratoryUnited States. Air Force. Air Research and Development CommandU.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive MedicineEnvironmental Noise Consultants, Inc.North Carolina State UniversityBerger, Elliott H.Franks, John R.Behar, AlbertoCasali, John G.Dixon-Ernst, ChristineKieper, Ronald W.Merry, Carol J.Mozo, Ben T.Nixon, Charles W.Ohlin, DougRoyster, Julia D.Royster, Larry H.2015-05-132015-05-131998-02-01Berger, E. H., Franks, J. R., Behar, A., Casali, J. G., Dixon-Ernst, C., Kieper, R. W., Merry, C. J., Mozo, B. T., Nixon, C. W., Ohlin, D., Royster, J. D., & Royster, L. H. (1998). Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(2), 665-672. doi: 10.1121/1.4232360001-4966http://hdl.handle.net/10919/52272The mandate of ASA Working Group S12/WG11 has been to develop "laboratory and/or field procedure(s) that yield useful estimates of field performance" of hearing protection devices (HPDs). A real-ear attenuation at threshold procedure was selected, devised, tested via an, interlaboratory study, and incorporated into a draft standard that was approved in 1997 [J. D. Royster et al., "Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1506-1526 (1996); ANSI S12.6-1997, "American National Standard Methods for Measuring Real-Ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors" (American National Standards Institute, New York, 1997)]. The real-world estimation procedure utilizes a subject-fit methodology with Listeners who are audiometrically proficient, but inexperienced in the use of HPDs. A key factor in the decision to utilize the subject-fit method was an evaluation of the representativeness of the laboratory data vis-a-vis attenuation values achieved by workers in practice, Twenty-two field studies were reviewed to develop a data base for comparison purposes, Results indicated that laboratory subject-fit attenuation values were typically equivalent to or greater than the field attenuation values, and yielded a better estimate of those values than did experimenter-fit or experimenter-supervised fit types of results. Recent data which are discussed in the paper, but which were not available at the time of the original analyses, confirm the findings. (C) 1998 Acoustical Society of America. [S0001-4966(98)03001-X].8 pagesapplication/pdfenIn CopyrightHearing protectionAcoustic analysisAcoustic instrumentationAcoustic noiseAcoustic noise measurementArticle - Refereedhttp://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/103/2/10.1121/1.423236https://doi.org/10.1121/1.423236