Chevalier, J. M.Buckles, D.2016-04-192016-04-1919990-88936-899-6http://hdl.handle.net/10919/65991Metadata only recordResearch on community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) has paid little attention to key assumptions it uses in the analysis of conflict and conflict management. The concepts of pacifism, egalitarianism, communalism, secularism, and rationalism are built into the community-based approach to natural resource management and are often treated as universal principles. In this paper, we examine differences in cultural perspectives on these assumptions. We also invite researchers to ground their practice of conflict management in the different social and cultural settings they encounter. Through the use of a conversational style of presentation and reference to cases presented in this volume, we attempt to bring the reader closer to oral forms of community-based politics, learning, and teaching, as an alternative approach to resolving differences in perspectives on the meaning of conflict and conflict management.text/plainen-USIn CopyrightConflictNatural resource managementNongovernmental organizations (NGOs)Community managementConflict managementNeighborhood communityLanduse or siting conflictsHtmlEqualityPacifismProfessional audiencesCultural conflict resolution processesOther approaches to conflictNon-governmental organizationsAdvocacyArticlesFull text resourcesGovernment agency non-courtCommunity-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM)CommunalismSecularismGovernanceConflict management: A heterocultural perspectiveAbstracthttp://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-31415-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html