Christofaro Fernandes, AríciaBeline, MarianePolizel, Guilherme Henrique GebimCavalcante Cracco, RobertaFerreira Dias, Evandro FernandoFurlan, Édisonda Luz e Silva, Saulode Almeida Santana, Miguel Henrique2024-02-012024-02-012023-11-24Christofaro Fernandes, A.; Beline, M.; Polizel, G.H.G.; Cavalcante Cracco, R.; Ferreira Dias, E.F.; Furlan, É.; da Luz e Silva, S.; de Almeida Santana, M.H. Fetal Programming and Its Effects on Meat Quality of Nellore Bulls. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 672.https://hdl.handle.net/10919/117816This work aimed to evaluate the effects of prenatal nutritional stimulation at different pregnancy stages on carcass traits and meat quality in bovine progeny. For this purpose, 63 Nellore bulls, born from cows submitted to three nutritional plans, were used: not programmed (NP), which did not receive protein supplementation; partially programmed (PP), which had protein-energy supplementation (0.3% of mean body weight of each batch) only in the final third of pregnancy; and full programming (FP), which received supplementation (0.3% of mean body weight of each batch) throughout pregnancy. The averages of parameters were submitted to the ANOVA, and the supplementation periods, which were different when <i>p</i> value &lt; 0.05, were compared. Carcass weights and rib eye area (REA) did not differ between treatments (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), but subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) showed a tendency (<i>p</i> = 0.08) between groups. For lipids and marbling, no differences were found (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). In the analyses of maturation time and shelf life, no difference was observed between treatments. However, there was a tendency between treatments at 14 days of maturation time for cooking loss (CL) (<i>p</i> = 0.08). Treatments did not affect shear force in the progenies (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Fetal programming had no effect on the meat quality of Nellore bulls.application/pdfenCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationaladiposebeef cattlematernal nutritionmuscle developmentprenatal supplementationArticle - Refereed2023-12-22https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10120672