Peralta, Oscar A.2014-03-142014-03-142003-06-12etd-06202003-122256http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33659The objective of the study was to compare three systems for detection of estrus and combinations of these systems on a large commercial dairy (1000 lactating cows) during stress of summer heat. At 37 to 45 days in milk (DIM), 266 cows were fitted with a HeatWatch (HW) device (HeatWatch; DDx Inc., Boulder, CO), an activity (A) sensor (ALPRO; DeLaval Inc., Kansas City, MO), and observed visually (V) twice daily. Pregnancy status was determined by uterine palpation 35 to 49 d following artificial insemination (AI). The effects of DIM, parity, physical activity, standing events, months, AI technician, and interval between onset of estrus and AI on conception rate were determined using linear contrasts and logistic regression. Efficiencies for detection of estrus, determined by comparing detected periods of estrus with a theoretical total of 707 periods, were 45.8% (V), 33.2% (A), 40.3% (HW), and 71.6% for all three systems simultaneously. Conception rates (LSM ± SE) by method of detection were 16.7 ± 4.9 for HW, 19.8 ± 5.5 for A, 7.9 ± 3.4 for V, 16.3 ± 6.0 for V + A, 27.6 ± 4.6 for V + HW, 21.1 ± 4.9 for A + HW, and 21.9 ± 4.5 for V + A + HW. Conception rate and number of mounts decreased for cows in first versus second and third parity (P < 0.05). For periods of estrus detected by A, the lowest conception rate (P < 0.05) occurred >18 h after the onset of estrus (16.7 ± 7.9). The highest conception rate occurred with the combination of V + HW, which confirms the premise that combination of multiple systems enhances both the efficiency and accuracy of detection.In CopyrightDetection of estrusefficiencyALPROHeatWatchheat stressThesishttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06202003-122256/