Browsing by Author "Aimone, Jason A."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    The Betrayal Aversion Elicitation Task: An Individual Level Betrayal Aversion Measure
    Aimone, Jason A.; Ball, Sheryl B.; Casas, Brooks (PLOS, 2015-09-02)
    Research on betrayal aversion shows that individuals’ response to risk depends not only on probabilities and payoffs, but also on whether the risk includes a betrayal of trust. While previous studies focus on measuring aggregate levels of betrayal aversion, the connection between an individual’s own betrayal aversion and other individually varying factors, including risk preferences, are currently unexplored. This paper develops a new task to elicit an individual’s level of betrayal aversion that can then be compared to individual characteristics. We demonstrate the feasibility of our new task and show that our aggregate individual results are consistent with previous studies. We then use this classification to ask whether betrayal aversion is correlated with risk aversion. While we find risk aversion and betrayal aversion have no significant relationship, we do observe that risk aversion is correlated with non-social risk preferences, but not the social, betrayal related, risk component of the new task.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Valuation in major depression is intact and stable in a non-learning environment
    Chung, Dongil; Kadlec, Kelly; Aimone, Jason A.; McCurry, Katherine L.; Casas, Brooks; Chiu, Pearl H. (Nature, 2017-03-10)
    The clinical diagnosis and symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) have been closely associated with impairments in reward processing. In particular, various studies have shown blunted neural and behavioral responses to the experience of reward in depression. However, little is known about whether depression affects individuals’ valuation of potential rewards during decision-making, independent from reward experience. To address this question, we used a gambling task and a model-based analytic approach to measure two types of individual sensitivity to reward values in participants with MDD: ‘risk preference,’ indicating how objective values are subjectively perceived, and ‘inverse temperature,’ determining the degree to which subjective value differences between options influence participants’ choices. On both of these measures of value sensitivity, participants with MDD were comparable to nonpsychiatric controls. In addition, both risk preference and inverse temperature were stable over four laboratory visits and comparable between the groups at each visit. Neither valuation measure varied with severity of clinical symptoms in MDD. These data suggest intact and stable value processing in MDD during risky decision-making.