Browsing by Author "Arnold, Lauren"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Histotripsy Ablation in Preclinical Animal Models of Cancer and Spontaneous Tumors in Veterinary Patients: A Review
    Hendricks-Wenger, Alissa; Arnold, Lauren; Gannon, Jessica; Simon, Alex; Singh, Neha; Sheppard, Hannah; Nagai-Singer, Margaret A.; Imran, Khan Mohammed; Lee, Kiho; Clark-Deener, Sherrie; Byron, Christopher R.; Edwards, Michael R.; Larson, Martha M.; Rossmeisl, John H. Jr.; Coutermarsh-Ott, Sheryl; Eden, Kristin; Dervisis, Nikolaos G.; Klahn, Shawna L.; Tuohy, Joanne L.; Allen, Irving C.; Vlaisavljevich, Eli (IEEE, 2021-09-03)
    New therapeutic strategies are direly needed in the fight against cancer. Over the last decade, several tumor ablation strategies have emerged as stand-alone or combination therapies. Histotripsy is the first completely noninvasive, nonthermal, and nonionizing tumor ablation method. Histotripsy can produce consistent and rapid ablations, even near critical structures. Additional benefits include real-time image guidance, high precision, and the ability to treat tumors of any predetermined size and shape. Unfortunately, the lack of clinically and physiologically relevant preclinical cancer models is often a significant limitation with all focal tumor ablation strategies. The majority of studies testing histotripsy for cancer treatment have focused on small animal models, which have been critical in moving this field forward and will continue to be essential for providing mechanistic insight. While these small animal models have notable translational value, there are significant limitations in terms of scale and anatomical relevance. To address these limitations, a diverse range of large animal models and spontaneous tumor studies in veterinary patients have emerged to complement existing rodent models. These models and veterinary patients are excellent at providing realistic avenues for developing and testing histotripsy devices and techniques designed for future use in human patients. Here, we provide a review of animal models used in preclinical histotripsy studies and compare histotripsy ablation in these models using a series of original case reports across a broad spectrum of preclinical animal models and spontaneous tumors in veterinary patients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Histotripsy Ablation of Bone Tumors: Feasibility Study in Excised Canine Osteosarcoma Tumors
    Arnold, Lauren; Hendricks-Wenger, Alissa; Coutermarsh-Ott, Sheryl; Gannon, Jessica; Hay, Alayna N.; Dervisis, Nikolaos G.; Klahn, Shawna L.; Allen, Irving C.; Tuohy, Joanne L.; Vlaisavljevich, Eli (Elsevier, 2021-12)
    Osteosarcoma (OS) is a primary bone tumor affecting both dogs and humans. Histotripsy is a non-thermal, non-invasive focused ultrasound method using controlled acoustic cavitation to mechanically disintegrate tissue. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of treating primary OS tumors with histotripsy using a 500-kHz transducer on excised canine OS samples harvested after surgery at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital at Virginia Tech. Samples were embedded in gelatin tissue phantoms and treated with the 500-kHz histotripsy system using one- or two-cycle pulses at a pulse repetition frequency of 250 Hz and a dosage of 4000 pulses/point. Separate experiments also assessed histotripsy effects on normal canine bone and nerve using the same pulsing parameters. After treatment, histopathological evaluation of the samples was completed. To determine the feasibility of treating OS through intact skin/soft tissue, additional histotripsy experiments assessed OS with overlying tissues. Generation of bubble clouds was achieved at the focus in all tumor samples at peak negative pressures of 26.2 ± 4.5 MPa. Histopathology revealed effective cell ablation in treated areas for OS tumors, with no evidence of cell death or tissue damage in normal tissues. Treatment through tissue/skin resulted in generation of well-confined bubble clouds and ablation zones inside OS tumors. Results illustrate the feasibility of treating OS tumors with histotripsy. CORRIGENDUM: The authors regret that errors were present in the above article. The legend for Figure 5 on page 3441 should read “Fig. 5. Normal, healthy, non-neoplastic bone was excised from amputated canine limbs and subjected to histology. No histological differences were noted between untreated (a: magnification 4 x, b: magnification 40 x) and treated samples (c: magnification 4 x, d: magnification 40 x).” Also, the final section heading on page 3439 should read “Histotripsy ablation of ex vivo bone and nerve specimens.” Finally, the reference after the last complete sentence on page 3437 is incomplete and should read “Focal pressure waveforms for the 500-kHz transducer were measured using a custom-built fiberoptic hydrophone (FOPH) in degassed water at the focal point of each transducer (Parsons et al. 2006).” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.