Browsing by Author "Bolles, Elliot Foster"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Leadership Characteristics of Military Veterans as School AdministratorsBolles, Elliot Foster (Virginia Tech, 2014-11-25)The Troops to Teachers (TTT) program was created in 1994 to provide funds to recruit and support former members of the military as teachers in high-poverty schools. Most of the research on TTT participants has been positive, and leadership is often mentioned as an important factor in participants' successes. A number of these military veterans have moved from the classroom into school administrative positions. Initial research on these administrators based on the ISLLC standards has been positive. This multiple case study drew from interviews and surveys with 15 former military veterans currently administrating in K-12 schools to increase our understanding of the experiences and values that they bring to the classroom. It relied on Stake's (YEAR) case study methodology to surface findings. The five findings, presented in order of strength of evidence, include: 1) Participants' overarching leadership philosophy was taking care of the people. 2) The leadership that participants had witnessed in both the military and in education influenced their own leadership. 3) Not all of the participants utilized TTT. 4) Participants had classroom experiences that were consistent with previous research on new teachers. 5) The veterans' values as they relate to trust, delegating responsibility, accountability, and beliefs in service, merit future inquiry. These values, along with "taking care of their people", appear to be the commonality between the two seemingly incongruent cultures of the military and education. This study has implications for future research and educational leadership training both at the university and district levels.
- Synergies among Education Stakeholders in Supporting Elementary Science: A Qualitative StudyThayer, Myra Lynn (Virginia Tech, 2022-06-03)The decisions and actions of principals impact the work in schools. The purpose of this research was to investigate the decisions and actions of elementary principals who support science and then compare those to the decisions and actions of teachers and central office staff. The primary question guiding the research was, What are the decisions and actions of elementary principals that support science education? Secondary questions were (1) How are the decisions and actions of elementary principals regarding science instruction impacted by those of central office science leaders? (2) How are the decisions and actions of elementary teachers regarding science instruction impacted by those of principals? This qualitative study involved interviewing six education stakeholders: one central office staff member, two school leaders, and three teachers that represented three schools in one school division. The questions focused on six components of principal leadership: high standards for student learning, rigorous curriculum, quality instruction, culture of learning and professional behavior, connections to external communities, and systemic performance accountability. The data were analyzed to compare the decisions and actions of the principal with the decisions and actions of the central office staff and teachers. The discussion of the findings includes components involving synergy among the three stakeholder groups. Decisions by the school leaders to build time for science instruction, curriculum planning, and professional development support science instruction. Curriculum resources and professional development from the central office are supports for schools. Included are recommendations of decisions and actions that may increase the synergy among the groups and the support for science. These components and practices are not unique to science and this framework could be used to ensure a cohesive instructional program across content areas. This research could provide school and division leaders with a series of actions for addressing the components of principal leadership and increase opportunities for all stakeholders to work together to enhance student achievement in science.