Browsing by Author "Capizzi, Seth"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Evaluation of Unit Load Stability Under Dynamic Forklift Handling ConditionsCapizzi, Seth (Virginia Tech, 2024-06-12)A vast amount of goods and products are transported in bulk as palletized unit loads, where the pallet is the base of the unit load. Material handling systems represent the physical environment in which unit loads are transported through supply chains. Material handling systems include different transportation modes and storage conditions, many of which are well researched. While industrial forklifts are paramount to material handling systems, the physical effect they have on load systems is not well understood. The weight of the unit load causes the pallets to deflect, and previous research has revealed that forklift vibration amplifies pallet deflection. The effects of forklift vibration on pallet deflection are not considered in international standards used to determine pallet load capacities. Standards such as ISO 8611 and ASTM D1185 provide deflection limits that are used to determine pallet load capacities, yet there is a lack of understanding and justification on these deflection limits related to forklift support conditions. A comprehensive understanding of the effects of forklift vibration on unit load performance is necessary to produce accurate and safe load capacity ratings. In this research, two studies were completed to gain further understanding on unit load performance and stability in forklift handling conditions. The first study evaluated pallet deflection and unit load stability of unbound unit loads designed with a 20 mm. performance limit (ISO 8611, 2011). Common forklift handling factors were investigated and included fork tine angle (level and 4-degree incline) and pallet orientation (racked across the width and across the length). The results showed that the dynamic environment of forklift handling created unstable unit loads. The second study of this research project investigated unit load performance against unit load design factors of load capacity (500 lbs., 750 lbs., 900 lbs.) and box size (8 in., 12 in., 16 in.). The results showed that unit load instability occurred at all load levels and all box sizes. Additionally, an increase in box size decreased load bridging for unit loads under fork tine support conditions. Furthermore, the time to instability was used to calculate projected forklift travel distances that can be used to further optimize material handling systems.