Browsing by Author "Eller, Arthur L. Jr."
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Beef cattle identificationEller, Arthur L. Jr. (Virginia Cooperative Extension, 1992)Discusses various ways to mark beef cattle for identification.
- Comparison of expected and actual progeny growth differences in crossbred calvesMahrt, Garry Sonn (Virginia Tech, 1987-06-05)The growth performance of Angus-Polled Hereford F1 calves was compared to the expected progeny differences (EPD) estimated by the American Polled Hereford Association to evaluate the usefulness of EPD estimates for improving commercial beef production. Polled Hereford sires were selected from the high accuracy sires listed in the American Polled Hereford Association's sire summary. Four types of sires were used: 1) Sires with high yearling weight and high maternal EPD's; 2) Sires with high yearling weight and low maternal EPDâ s; 3) Sires with low yearling weight and high maternal EPD's; and 4) Sires with low yearling weight and low maternal EPD's. The resulting progeny were weighed at birth, approximately 135 d, weaning and approximately 1 yr. Hip heights were also measured at weaning. Linear regressions of progeny performance on EPD indicated that birth and yearling weights were accurately predicted by their respective EPD estimates. Weight and height at weaning were not accurately predicted by weaning weight EPD. Partial regressions of progeny performance on yearling weight and maternal EPD's were also calculated. Regression of progeny performance on yearling weight EPD resulted in .16 ±.09 kg/kg for 135-d weight, .28 ± .09 kg/kg for weaning weight, .073 ± .020 cm/kg for weaning hip height and .93 ±.19 kg/kg for yearling weight. Comparable regression values for maternal EPD were .44 ± .18 kg/kg, .31 ± .17 kg/kg, .100 ± .040 cm/kg and .22 ± .36 kg/kg for 135-d, weaning weight, weaning hip height and yearling weight, respectively. These results indicate that maternal EPD values predicted some differences in preweaning growth that were not predicted by yearling weight EPD. The progeny performance data was also used to calculate independent EPD estimates for birthweight, weaning weight, and yearling weight. Correlations between these EPD estimates and those made by the American Polled Hereford Association were .49 for birthweight, .26 for weaning weight and .66 for yearling weight. The low correlation between weaning weight EPD estimates was significantly below expectation and indicates that the American Polled Hereford Association estimates were inadequate for predicting preweaning growth differences in these crossbred calves.
- Correlation of predicted breeding values across environments in the presence of selection for direct and maternal breeding valuesDiaz-Martin, Clara (Virginia Tech, 1992-08-05)A simulation approach was used to determine the effects of multitrait selection on the correlations of sire direct and maternal predicted breeding values across environments. True and predicted direct and maternal breeding values (BV) of sires were simulated for sires evaluated independently in two different environments. Prediction error variances and covariances among direct and maternal BV within environments were required for the simulation. To obtain the necessary input parameters, a variety of MME coefficient matrices were created and inverted to inspect relationship among accuracies and correlations of prediction errors in sire evaluation models. An empirical prediction equation to predict the necessary prediction error covariances was obtained. Divergent, directional and random multitrait selection was then practiced using direct and maternal predicted BV as selection criteria. Samples of 40 sires were randomly obtained from each selected population. Observed correlations between direct and maternal predicted BV across environments were compared to expectations derived from univariate distribution theory. Selection definitely affected the expectations. However, the adjustment developed from univariate theory appeared to accommodate the effect of selection in these expectations.
- Crop residue feeds for beef cattleGerken, Hubert J. Jr.; Eller, Arthur L. Jr.; Smith, Easley S.; White, Harlan E. (Virginia Cooperative Extension, 1992)Discusses various crop residue that can be used as low-cost feeds for beef cattle.
- Evaluation of phenotypic and genetic trends in weaning weight in Angus and Hereford populations in VirginiaNadarajah, Kanagasabai (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1985)Total weaning weight records of 29,832 Angus and 15,765 Hereford calves born during 1953 through 1983 in Virginia were used to evaluate phenotypic and genetic trends for adjusted weaning weight (AWWT), weaning weight ratio (WWR) and deviation of AWWT from the mean AWWT of the contemporaries (DEVN). Two approaches, namely the regression techniques and maximum likelihood (ML) procedure were taken to estimate the above trends. The estimates of annual phenotypic trend for AWWT in the Angus and Hereford breeds were .96 and .82 kg/yr, respectively. The sire and dam genetic trends obtained from both approaches for the traits of interest were positive and significant; however, the estimates from the regression analyses were slightly higher than those- from the ML procedure. The estimates of one-half of the sire genetic trends obtained from ML procedure for WWR and DEVN were .40 ± .04 ratio units/yr and .72 ± .07 kg/yr in the Angus breed and the corresponding values for the Hereford breed were .25 ± .06 ratio units/yr and .45 ± .12 kg/yr. The estimates of one-half of the darn trends for the corresponding traits were .32 ± .02 ratio units/yr and .55 ± .04 kg/yr for Angus and .21 ± .03 ratio units/yr and .30 ± .07 kg/yr for Herefords. The application of adjustment factors (to eliminate the bias due to non-random mating and culling levels) to estimates of sire genetic trends in the regression analyses produced estimates more similar to the estimates obtained from the ML procedure. The average annual genetic trends over the study period from the ML procedure for AWWT were 1.27 kg/yr for Angus and .75 kg/yr for Herefords.
- Livestock Update. August 2011Greiner, Scott P.; Eller, Arthur L. Jr. (Virginia Cooperative Extension, 2011-08-01)Contains articles on August beef management, Tri-State Cow Calf Conference, Virginia Livestock Hall of Fame, tips for successful sheep breeding, sheep field day, and an upcoming conference on parasite control in sheep and goats.
- Pre- and postpartum nutritional effects on milk production, milk composition, calf weaning weight and postpartum reproductive performance of commercial beef cowsKearnan, Jeffrey Mark (Virginia Tech, 1991-09-15)The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of prepartum and postpartum nutrition on milk production of commercial beef cows. Forty-three Angus or Angus X Holstein females, ranging in age from 2 to 6 yr, were randomly assigned by age and percentage Holstein within age to one of two prepartum grazing treatments (PRE). All females, regardless of PRE, were assigned at calving to receive the same post-calving nutritional energy. Females were assigned at calving by age, percentage Holstein within age, prepartum nutritional treatment and calving date to one of two milking groups. Milk weight (grams), milk composition (fat, protein, lactose, solids-not-fat, somatic cell count), dam body condition score (1 to 9), dam body weight, dam backfat thickness, loineye area, calf weaning weight and postpartum interval to estrus were all evaluated. Milk removal occurred biweekly by vacuum milking machine after intravenous injection of 20 IU of oxytocin. Samples were weighed and taken for milk analysis and determination of milk components. At 76± 10 d post-calving, females were assigned by age, percentage Holstein within age, prepartum nutritional treatment, and calving date to receive one of two postpartum nutritional treatments (POST). Females continued to be milked by machine biweekly until calves were weaned 199 ± 10 d. Differences in grazing level prior to calving significantly effected calf birth weights, with dams on the prepartum restricted grazing being lighter in weight at birth, 36.69 ± .68 and 38.95 ± .81 kg for PRE-L and PRE-H groups, respectively, however grazing differences did not effect calf weaning weight, calf gain or calf average daily gain. POST nutritional treatments significantly effected all calf performance traits with 37.10±.70, 38.54±.88; 196.89±4.9, 213.33±6.2; 159.79±4.8, 174.78±6.0; .809±.024, .888±.030; for birth weight, weaning weight, calf gain and calf average daily gain from cows on the POST -M or POST -H nutritional treatments, respectively. Pre-partum nutrition effected milk production (P < .001) with dams from the PRE-L grazing group producing less milk, 5622 ± 75 vs 6888 ±80 g. Postpartum energy also effected milk production with dams on the POST-H energy level producing more milk than dams from the POST-M group. Percentages of fat, protein, lactose and solids-not-fat were not different between the prepartum or postpartum diets (P>. 10). Somatic cell count was negatively correlated with dam milk production (P< .03). Postpartum interval to estrus was shorter for the PRE-L group than for the PRE-H, 43 ± 4 vs 53 ± 4 d.
- Virginia beef cattle improvement guideEller, Arthur L. Jr. (Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, 1980-09)Beef production, like all of agriculture, is becoming more specialized, more sophisticated, and thus, more dependent on accurate management decisions. Production records that are accurate and up-to-date are a must if herd owner or manager is to make correct and timely decisions for greater profit. The key is profit. No longer can the inefficient, unproductive animal be tolerated or propagated in the registered or the commercial herd. This is where performance records come in.
- Virginia's beef industry : a study and blueprint for the year 2000Stanley, Thomas; Eller, Arthur L. Jr.; McKinnon, Bill R.; Wahlberg, Mark L.; Gerken, Hubert J. Jr. (Virginia Cooperative Extension, 1993)Beef production in the Commonwealth of Virginia has a long and rich history, having its roots in colonial times and having developed into a strong. viable industry in modem Virginia. Today, Virginia, with 1.78 million cattle, ranks 19th in the U.S. and with 735,000 beef cows, ranks 18th. Virginia's beef industry has grown and developed principally because beef cattle arc one of the most suitable enterprises to utilize pasture and forage which is found in abundance throughout most of the state. Cattle offer a means to market these feed stuffs which would otherwise have little value.