Browsing by Author "Gabauer, Douglas John"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Applications of Event Data Recorder Derived Crash Severity Metrics to Injury Prevention
    Dean, Morgan Elizabeth (Virginia Tech, 2023-05-25)
    Since 2015, there have been more than 35,000 fatalities annually due to crashes on United States roads [1], [2]. Typically, road departure crashes account for less than 10% of all annual crash occupants yet comprise nearly one third of all crash fatalities in the US [3]. In the year 2020, road departure crashes accounted for 50% of crash fatalities [2]. Road departure crashes are characterized by a vehicle leaving the intended lane of travel, departing the roadway, and striking a roadside object, such as a tree or pole, or roadside condition, such as a slope or body of water. One strategy currently implemented to mitigate these types of crashes is the use of roadside barriers. Roadside barriers, such as metal guardrails, concrete barriers, and cable barriers, are designed to reduce the severity of road departure crashes by acting as a shield between the departed vehicle and more hazardous roadside obstacles. Much like new vehicles undergo regulatory crash tests, barriers must adhere to a set of crash test procedures to ensure the barriers perform as intended. Currently, the procedures for full-scale roadside barrier crash tests used to evaluate the crash performance of roadside safety hardware are outlined in The Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) [4]. During roadside barrier tests, the assessment of occupant injury risk is crucial, as the purpose of the hardware is to prevent the vehicle from colliding with a more detrimental roadside object, all the while minimizing, and not posing additional, risk to the occupants. Unlike the new vehicle regulatory crash tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), MASH does not require the use of instrumented anthropomorphic test devices (ATD). Instead, one of the prescribed occupant risk assessment methods in MASH is the flail space model (FSM), which was introduced in 1981 and models an occupant as an unrestrained point mass. The FSM is comprised of two crash severity metrics that can be calculated using acceleration data from the test vehicle. Each metric is prescribed a maximum threshold in MASH and if either threshold is exceeded during a crash test the test fails due to high occupant injury risk. Since the inception of the FSM metrics and their thresholds, the injury prediction capabilities of these metrics have only been re-investigated in the frontal crash mode, despite MASH prescribing an oblique 25-degree impact angle for passenger vehicle barrier tests. The focus of this dissertation was to use EDR data from real-world crashes to assess the current relevance of roadside barrier crash test occupant risk assessment methods to the modern vehicle fleet and occupant population. Injury risk prediction models were constructed for the two FSM-based metrics and five additional crash severity metrics for three crash modes: frontal, side, and oblique. For each crash mode and metric combination, four injury prediction models were constructed: one to predict probability of injury to any region of the body and three to predict probability of injury to the head/face, neck, and thorax regions. While the direct application of these models is to inform future revisions of MASH crash test procedures, the developed models have valuable applications for other areas of transportation safety besides just roadside safety. The final two chapters of this dissertation explore these additional applications: 1) assessing the injury mitigation effectiveness of an advanced automatic emergency braking system, and 2) informing speed limit selection that supports the safe system approach. The findings in this dissertation indicate that both the FSM and additional crash severity metrics do a reasonable job predicting occupant injury risk in oblique crashes. One of the additional metrics performs better than the two FSM metrics. Additionally, several occupant factors, such as belt status and age, play significant roles in occupant risk prediction. These findings have important implications for future revisions of MASH, which could benefit from considering additional metrics and occupant factors in the occupant risk assessment procedures.
  • Thumbnail Image
    A Dataset of Vehicle and Pedestrian Trajectories from Normal Driving and Crash Events in One Year of Virginia Traffic Camera Data
    Bareiss, Max G. (Virginia Tech, 2023-06-07)
    Traffic cameras are those cameras operated with the purpose of observing traffic, often streaming video in real-time to traffic management centers. These camera video streams allow transportation authorities to respond to traffic events and maintain situational awareness. However, traffic cameras also have the potential to directly capture crashes and conflicts, providing enough information to perform reconstruction and gain insights regarding causation and remediation. Beyond crash events, traffic camera video also offers an opportunity to study normal driving. Normal driver behavior is important for traffic planners, vehicle designers, and in the form of numerical driver models is vital information for the development of automated vehicles. Traffic cameras installed by state departments of transportation have already been placed in locations relevant to their interests. A wide range of driver behavior can be studied from these locations by observing vehicles at all times and under all weather conditions. Current systems to analyze traffic camera video focus on detecting when traffic events occur, with very little information about the specifics of those events. Prior studies into traffic event detection or reconstruction used 1-7 cameras placed by the researchers and collected dozens of hours of video. Crashes and other interesting events are rare and cannot be sufficiently characterized by camera installations of that size. The objective of this dissertation was to explore the utility of traffic camera data for transportation research by modeling and characterizing crash and non-crash behavior in pedestrians and drivers using a captured dataset of traffic camera video from the Commonwealth of Virginia, named the VT-CAST (Virginia Traffic Cameras for Advanced Safety Technologies) 2020 dataset. A total of 6,779,726 hours of traffic camera video was captured from live internet streams from December 17, 2019 at 4:00PM to 11:59PM on December 31, 2020. Video was analyzed by a custom R-CNN convolutional neural network keypoint detector to identify the locations of vehicles on the ground. The OpenPifPaf model was used to identify the locations of pedestrians on the ground. The location, pan, tilt, zoom, and altitude of each traffic camera was reconstructed to develop a mapping between the locations of vehicles and pedestrians on-screen and their physical location on the surface of the Earth. These physical detections were tracked across time to determine the trajectories on the surface of the Earth for each visible vehicle and pedestrian in a random sample of the captured video. Traffic camera video offers a unique opportunity to study crashes in-depth which are not police reported. Crashes in the traffic camera video were identified, analyzed, and compared to nationally representative datasets. Potential crashes were identified during the study interval by inspecting Virginia 511 traffic alerts for events which occurred near traffic cameras and impacted the flow of traffic. The video from these cameras was manually reviewed to determine whether a crash was visible. Pedestrian crashes, which did not significantly impact traffic, were identified from police accident reports (PARs) as a separate analysis. A total of 292 crashes were identified from traffic alerts, and six pedestrian crashes were identified from PARs. Road departure and rear-end crashes occurred in similar proportions to national databases, but intersection crashes were underrepresented and severe and rollover cases were overrepresented. Among these crashes, 32% of single-vehicle crashes and 50% of multi-vehicle crashes did not appear in the Virginia crash database. This finding shows promise for traffic cameras as a future data source for crash reconstruction, indicating traffic cameras are a capable tool to study unreported crashes. The safe operation of autonomous vehicles requires perception systems which make accurate short-term predictions of driver and pedestrian behavior. While road user behavior can be observed by the autonomous vehicles themselves, traffic camera video offers another potential information source for algorithm development. As a fixed roadside data source, these cameras capture a very large number of traffic interactions at a single location. This allows for detailed analyses of important roadway configurations across a wide range of drivers. To evaluate the efficacy of this approach, a total of 58 intersections in the VT-CAST 2020 dataset were sampled for driver trajectories at intersection entry, yielding 58,180 intersection entry trajectories. K-means clustering was used to group these trajectories into a family of 45 trajectory clusters. Likely as a function of signal phase, distinct groups of accelerating, constant speed, and decelerating trajectories were present. Accelerating and decelerating trajectories each occurred more frequently than constant speed trajectories. The results indicate that roadside data may be useful for understanding broad trends in typical intersection approaches for application to automated vehicle systems or other investigations; however, data utility would be enhanced with detailed signal phase information. A similar analysis was conducted of the interactions between drivers and pedestrians. A total of 35 crosswalks were identified in the VT-CAST 2020 dataset with sufficient trajectory information, yielding 1,488 trajectories of drivers interacting with pedestrians. K-means clustering was used to group these trajectories into a family of 16 trajectory clusters. Distinct groups of accelerating, constant speed, and decelerating trajectories were present, including trajectory clusters which described vehicles slowing down around pedestrians. Constant speed trajectories occurred the most often, followed by accelerating trajectories and decelerating trajectories. As with the prior investigation, this finding suggests that roadside data may be used in the development of driver-pedestrian interaction models for automated vehicles and other use cases involving a combination of pedestrians and vehicles. Overall, this dissertation demonstrates the utility of standard traffic camera data for use in traffic safety research. As evidence, there are already three current studies (beyond this dissertation) using the video data and trajectories from the VT-CAST 2020 dataset. Potential future studies include analyzing the mobile phone use of pedestrians, analyzing mid-block pedestrian crossings, automatically performing roadway safety assessments, considering the behavior of drivers following congested driving, evaluating the effectiveness of work zone hazard countermeasures, and understanding roadway encroachments.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Predicting Occupant Injury with Vehicle-Based Injury Criteria in Roadside Crashes
    Gabauer, Douglas John (Virginia Tech, 2008-06-06)
    This dissertation presents the results of a research effort aimed at improving the current occupant injury criteria typically used to assess occupant injury risk in crashes involving roadside hardware such as guardrail. These metrics attempt to derive the risk of injury based solely on the response of the vehicle during a collision event. The primary purpose of this research effort was to determine if real-world crash injury prediction could be improved by augmenting the current vehicle-based metrics with vehicle-specific structure and occupant restraint performance measures. Based on an analysis of the responses of 60 crash test dummies in full-scale crash tests, vehicle-based occupant risk criteria were not found to be an accurate measure of occupant risk and were unable to predict the variation in occupant risk for unbelted, belted, airbag only, or belt and airbag restrained occupants. Through the use of Event Data Recorder (EDR) data coupled with occupant injury data for 214 real-world crashes, age-adjusted injury risk curves were developed relating vehicle-based metrics to occupant injury in real-world frontal collisions. A comparison of these risk curves based on model fit statistics and an ROC curve analysis indicated that the more computationally intensive metrics that require knowledge of the entire crash pulse offer no statistically significant advantage over the simpler delta-V crash severity metric in discriminating between serious and non-serious occupant injury. This finding underscores the importance of developing an improved vehicle-based injury metric. Based on an analysis of 619 full-scale frontal crash tests, adjustments to delta-V that reflect the vehicle structure performance and occupant restraint performance are found to predict 4 times the variation of resultant occupant chest acceleration than delta-V alone. The combination of delta-V, ridedown efficiency, and the kinetic energy factor was found to provide the best prediction of the occupant chest kinematics. Real-world crash data was used to evaluate the developed modified delta-V metrics based on their ability to predict injury in real-world collisions. Although no statistically significant improvement in injury prediction was found, the modified models did show evidence of improvement over the traditional delta-V metric.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Residual Crashes and Injured Occupants with Lane Departure Prevention Systems
    Riexinger, Luke E. (Virginia Tech, 2021-04-19)
    Every year, approximately 34,000 individuals are fatally injured in crashes on US roads [1]. These fatalities occur across many types of crash scenarios, each with its own causation factors. One way to prioritize research on a preventive technology is to compare the number of occupant fatalities relative to the total number of occupants involved in a crash scenario. Four crash modes are overrepresented among fatalities: single vehicle road departure crashes, control loss crashes, cross-centerline head-on crashes, and pedestrian/cyclist crashes [2]. Interestingly, three of these crash scenarios require the subject vehicle to depart from the initial lane of travel. Lane departure warning (LDW) systems track the vehicle lane position and can alert the driver through audible and haptic feedback before the vehicle crosses the lane line. Lane departure prevention (LDP) systems can perform an automatic steering maneuver to prevent the departure. Another method of prioritizing research is to determine factors common among the fatal crashes. In 2017, 30.4% of passenger vehicle crash fatalities involved a vehicle rollover [1]. Half of all fatal single vehicle road departure crashes resulted in a rollover yet only 12% of fatal multi-vehicle crashes involved a rollover [1]. These often occur after the driver has lost control of the vehicle and departed the road. Electronic stability control (ESC) can provide different braking to each wheel and allow the vehicle to maintain heading. While ESC is a promising technology, some rollover crashes still occur. Passive safety systems such as seat belts, side curtain airbags, and stronger roofs work to protect occupants during rollover crashes. Seat belts prevent occupants from moving inside the occupant compartment during the rollover and both seat belts and side curtain airbags can prevent occupants from being ejected from the vehicle. Stronger roofs ensure that the roof is not displaced during the rollover and the integrity of the occupant compartment is maintained to prevent occupant ejection. The focus of this dissertation is to evaluate the effectiveness of vehicle-based countermeasures, such as lane departure warning and electronic stability control, for preventing or mitigating single vehicle road departure crashes, cross-centerline head-on crashes, and single vehicle rollover crashes. This was accomplished by understanding how drivers respond to both road departure and cross-centerline events in real-world crashes. These driver models were used to simulate real crash scenarios with LDW/LDP systems to quantify their potential crash reduction. The residual crashes, which are not avoided with LDW/LDP systems or ESC, were analyzed to estimate the occupant injury outcome. For rollover crashes, a novel injury model was constructed that includes modern passive safety countermeasures such as seat belts, side curtain airbags, and stronger roofs. The results for road departure, head-on, and control loss rollover crashes were used to predict the number of crashes and injured occupants in the future. This work is important for identifying the residual crashes that require further research to reduce the number of injured crash occupants.