Browsing by Author "Golden, Heather E."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Modeling Connectivity of Non-floodplain Wetlands: Insights, Approaches, and Recommendations
    Jones, C. Nathan; Ameli, Ali; Neff, Brian P.; Evenson, Grey R.; McLaughlin, Daniel L.; Golden, Heather E.; Lane, Charles R. (2019-06)
    Representing hydrologic connectivity of non-floodplain wetlands (NFWs) to downstream waters in process-based models is an emerging challenge relevant to many research, regulatory, and management activities. We review four case studies that utilize process-based models developed to simulate NFW hydrology. Models range from a simple, lumped parameter model to a highly complex, fully distributed model. Across case studies, we highlight appropriate application of each model, emphasizing spatial scale, computational demands, process representation, and model limitations. We end with a synthesis of recommended "best modeling practices" to guide model application. These recommendations include: (1) clearly articulate modeling objectives, and revisit and adjust those objectives regularly; (2) develop a conceptualization of NFW connectivity using qualitative observations, empirical data, and process-based modeling; (3) select a model to represent NFW connectivity by balancing both modeling objectives and available resources; (4) use innovative techniques and data sources to validate and calibrate NFW connectivity simulations; and (5) clearly articulate the limits of the resulting NFW connectivity representation. Our review and synthesis of these case studies highlights modeling approaches that incorporate NFW connectivity, demonstrates tradeoffs in model selection, and ultimately provides actionable guidance for future model application and development.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Vulnerable Waters are Essential to Watershed Resilience
    Lane, Charles R.; Creed, Irena F.; Golden, Heather E.; Leibowitz, Scott G.; Mushet, David M.; Rains, Mark C.; Wu, Qiusheng; D'Amico, Ellen; Alexander, Laurie C.; Ali, Genevieve A.; Basu, Nandita B.; Bennett, Micah G.; Christensen, Jay R.; Cohen, Matthew J.; Covino, Tim P.; DeVries, Ben; Hill, Ryan A.; Jencso, Kelsey; Lang, Megan W.; McLaughlin, Daniel L.; Rosenberry, Donald O.; Rover, Jennifer; Vanderhoof, Melanie K. (Springer, 2022-02-07)
    Watershed resilience is the ability of a watershed to maintain its characteristic system state while concurrently resisting, adapting to, and reorganizing after hydrological (for example, drought, flooding) or biogeochemical (for example, excessive nutrient) disturbances. Vulnerable waters include non-floodplain wetlands and headwater streams, abundant watershed components representing the most distal extent of the freshwater aquatic network. Vulnerable waters are hydrologically dynamic and biogeochemically reactive aquatic systems, storing, processing, and releasing water and entrained (that is, dissolved and particulate) materials along expanding and contracting aquatic networks. The hydrological and biogeochemical functions emerging from these processes affect the magnitude, frequency, timing, duration, storage, and rate of change of material and energy fluxes among watershed components and to downstream waters, thereby maintaining watershed states and imparting watershed resilience. We present here a conceptual framework for understanding how vulnerable waters confer watershed resilience. We demonstrate how individual and cumulative vulnerable-water modifications (for example, reduced extent, altered connectivity) affect watershed-scale hydrological and biogeochemical disturbance response and recovery, which decreases watershed resilience and can trigger transitions across thresholds to alternative watershed states (for example, states conducive to increased flood frequency or nutrient concentrations). We subsequently describe how resilient watersheds require spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability in hydrological and biogeochemical interactions between terrestrial systems and down-gradient waters, which necessitates attention to the conservation and restoration of vulnerable waters and their downstream connectivity gradients. To conclude, we provide actionable principles for resilient watersheds and articulate research needs to further watershed resilience science and vulnerable-water management.