Browsing by Author "Hua, Lesheng"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Developing a Teen Driving Meta-Database Using Three Naturalistic Teen Driving Studies Plus Driver Coach Study
    Klauer, Charlie; Hua, Lesheng; Dingus, Thomas A. (2024-01-25)
    Motor vehicle collisions are the leading cause of death for teens aged 16 to 19. The risk of motor vehicle crashes is higher among teens aged 16 to 19 than among any other age group. Despite great interest in teen risky driving, little objective information about its prevalence is available. The Naturalistic Teenage Driving Study (NTDS), conducted at the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (VTTI), provided a rich and powerful dataset, which permits researchers to evaluate driving performance over long periods and provide objective measures of driving risks and contributing factors. However, the NTDS only had 42 novice drivers from southwest Virginia. With the lack of other naturalistic studies of novice teenage driving for comparison, its findings are tentative and need further exploration and confirmation. More NDSs are needed to obtain additional crash data and determine what factors could lead to teen risky driving. Using the trigger thresholds from the NTDS, event databases were created from the Supervised Practice Driving Study (SPDS), the SPDS Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Cohort NDS, the Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) NDS, and the Driver Coach Study. Similarly, a database of baseline epochs, per guidelines from the NTDS, was also developed for each of these studies. All event and baseline databases from all five studies were combined into one database to perform meta-analyses using naturalistic teenage driving data. This database is the most complete naturalistic teenage driving database in the world. Many of the key analyses that were performed on only 42 teenage drivers in the NTDS can now be performed on 489 novice drivers from seven locations around the U.S. In this report, we describe each database briefly, including the ADHD teen study, and provide notations about purpose, methods, measures, and instrumentation. We then review what have learned from each database about young driver crash risk. Studies based on the meta-database mainly focused on the prevalence of teen secondary task engagement, distraction, risky driving behavior, and progression of driving skill, as well as the associated crash risks for these behaviors. New projects and new work that this tool has already yielded are described herein, and additional work that still needs to be done is outlined.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Do Real-time and Post Hoc Feedback Reduce Teen Drivers' Engagement in Secondary Tasks?
    Hua, Lesheng; Ankem, Gayatri; Noble, Alexandria; Baynes, Peter; Klauer, Charlie; Dingus, Thomas A. (National Surface Transportation Safety Center for Excellence, 2023-08-02)
    In 2020, 2,800 teens in the United States between the ages of 13 and 19 were killed in motor vehicle crashes (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023). The purpose of this study is to assess if there is an additional benefit to the driver feedback system implemented in the Driver Coach Study (Klauer et al., 2017) on secondary task reduction and if the same trends of parental involvement are observed. The data used in this study were drawn from two previously completed naturalistic driving studies involving teenage drivers. The Driver Coach Study recruited 90 teen-parent dyads and presented the teen driver with feedback on their driving performance for the first 6 months (Klauer et al., 2017). Parents were able to review a website that provided information on the feedback that their teen received. The Driver Coach Study data were compared to the Supervised Practice Driving Study, which observed 88 teenage drivers during naturalistic driving in the same geographic location who did not receive feedback. Novice driver secondary task engagement was recorded. Parental involvement was examined by tracking which teen/parent groups checked the website and which did not. Results suggest that teen drivers who received feedback were overall less likely to engage in secondary tasks as well as less likely to multitask than those teen drivers who did not receive feedback. Additionally, females generally engaged in secondary tasks more often than males. Teen drivers whose parents logged in to the feedback website also reduced their engagement in some secondary tasks but not all. Unfortunately, no significant reduction in cell phone use was observed between teen drivers who received feedback and those who did not. Overall, the results suggest that further research should be conducted, as monitoring and feedback for teen drivers does reduce overall secondary task engagement.