Browsing by Author "Jonnavittula, Ananth"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Here's What I've Learned: Asking Questions that Reveal Reward Learning
    Habibian, Soheil; Jonnavittula, Ananth; Losey, Dylan P. (ACM, 2022-09-08)
    Robots can learn from humans by asking questions. In these questions the robot demonstrates a few different behaviors and asks the human for their favorite. But how should robots choose which questions to ask? Today's robots optimize for informative questions that actively probe the human's preferences as efficiently as possible. But while informative questions make sense from the robot's perspective, human onlookers may find them arbitrary and misleading. In this paper we formalize active preference-based learning from the human's perspective. We hypothesize that --- from the human's point-of-view --- the robot's questions reveal what the robot has and has not learned. Our insight enables robots to use questions to make their learning process transparent to the human operator. We develop and test a model that robots can leverage to relate the questions they ask to the information these questions reveal. We then introduce a trade-off between informative and revealing questions that considers both human and robot perspectives: a robot that optimizes for this trade-off actively gathers information from the human while simultaneously keeping the human up to date with what it has learned. We evaluate our approach across simulations, online surveys, and in-person user studies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Here’s What I’ve Learned: Asking Questions that Reveal Reward Learning
    Habibian, Soheil; Jonnavittula, Ananth; Losey, Dylan P. (Virginia Tech, 2021-07-02)
    Robots can learn from humans by asking questions. In these questions the robot demonstrates a few different behaviors and asks the human for their favorite. But how should robots choose which questions to ask? Today’s robots optimize for informative questions that actively probe the human’s preferences as efficiently as possible. But while informative questions make sense from the robot’s perspective, human onlookers often find them arbitrary and misleading. For example, consider an assistive robot learning to put away the dishes. Based on your answers to previous questions this robot knows where it should stack each dish; however, the robot is unsure about right height to carry these dishes. A robot optimizing only for informative questions focuses purely on this height: it shows trajectories that carry the plates near or far from the table, regardless of whether or not they stack the dishes correctly. As a result, when we see this question, we mistakenly think that the robot is still confused about where to stack the dishes! In this paper we formalize active preference-based learning from the human’s perspective. We hypothesize that — from the human’s point-of-view — the robot’s questions reveal what the robot has and has not learned. Our insight enables robots to use questions to make their learning process transparent to the human operator.We develop and test a model that robots can leverage to relate the questions they ask to the information these questions reveal. We then introduce a trade-off between informative and revealing questions that considers both human and robot perspectives: a robot that optimizes for this trade-off actively gathers information from the human while simultaneously keeping the human up to date with what it has learned. We evaluate our approach across simulations, online surveys, and in-person user studies. We find that robots which consider the human’s point of view learn just as quickly as state-of-the-art baselines while also communicating what they have learned to the human operator. Videos of our user studies and results are available here: https://youtu.be/tC6y_jHN7Vw.
  • Thumbnail Image
    I Know What You Meant: Learning Human Objectives by (Under)estimating Their Choice Set
    Jonnavittula, Ananth; Losey, Dylan P. (Virginia Tech, 2021-04-05)
    Assistive robots have the potential to help people perform everyday tasks. However, these robots first need to learn what it is their user wants them to do. Teaching assistive robots is hard for inexperienced users, elderly users, and users living with physical disabilities, since often these individuals are unable to show the robot their desired behavior. We know that inclusive learners should give human teachers credit for what they cannot demonstrate. But today’s robots do the opposite: they assume every user is capable of providing any demonstration. As a result, these robots learn to mimic the demonstrated behavior, even when that behavior is not what the human really meant! Here we propose a different approach to reward learning: robots that reason about the user’s demonstrations in the context of similar or simpler alternatives. Unlike prior works — which err towards overestimating the human’s capabilities — here we err towards underestimating what the human can input (i.e., their choice set). Our theoretical analysis proves that underestimating the human’s choice set is risk-averse, with better worst-case performance than overestimating. We formalize three properties to generate similar and simpler alternatives. Across simulations and a user study, our resulting algorithm better extrapolates the human’s objective. See the user study here: https://youtu.be/RgbH2YULVRo.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Learning to Share Autonomy Across Repeated Interaction
    Jonnavittula, Ananth; Losey, Dylan P. (Virginia Tech, 2021-07-20)
    Wheelchair-mounted robotic arms (and other assistive robots) should help their users perform everyday tasks. One way robots can provide this assistance is shared autonomy. Within shared autonomy, both the human and robot maintain control over the robot’s motion: as the robot becomes confident it understands what the human wants, it increasingly intervenes to automate the task. But how does the robot know what tasks the human may want to perform in the first place? Today’s shared autonomy approaches often rely on prior knowledge: for example, the robot must know the set of possible human goals a priori. In the long-term, however, this prior knowledge will inevitably break down — sooner or later the human will reach for a goal that the robot did not expect. In this paper we propose a learning approach to shared autonomy that takes advantage of repeated interactions. Learning to assist humans would be impossible if they performed completely different tasks at every interaction: but our insight is that users living with physical disabilities repeat important tasks on a daily basis (e.g., opening the fridge, making coffee, and having dinner). We introduce an algorithm that exploits these repeated interactions to recognize the human’s task, replicate similar demonstrations, and return control when unsure. As the human repeatedly works with this robot, our approach continually learns to assist tasks that were never specified beforehand: these tasks include both discrete goals (e.g., reaching a cup) and continuous skills (e.g., opening a drawer). Across simulations and an in-person user study, we demonstrate that robots leveraging our approach match existing shared autonomy methods for known goals, and outperform imitation learning baselines on new tasks. See videos here: https://youtu.be/NazeLVbQ2og.
  • Thumbnail Image
    SARI: Shared Autonomy across Repeated Interaction
    Jonnavittula, Ananth; Mehta, Shaunak; Losey, Dylan P. (ACM, 2024)
    Assistive robot arms try to help their users perform everyday tasks. One way robots can provide this assistance is shared autonomy. Within shared autonomy, both the human and robot maintain control over the robot’s motion: as the robot becomes conident it understands what the human wants, it intervenes to automate the task. But how does the robot know these tasks in the irst place? State-of-the-art approaches to shared autonomy often rely on prior knowledge. For instance, the robot may need to know the human’s potential goals beforehand. During long-term interaction these methods will inevitably break down Ð sooner or later the human will attempt to perform a task that the robot does not expect. Accordingly, in this paper we formulate an alternate approach to shared autonomy that learns assistance from scratch. Our insight is that operators repeat important tasks on a daily basis (e.g., opening the fridge, making cofee). Instead of relying on prior knowledge, we therefore take advantage of these repeated interactions to learn assistive policies. We introduce SARI, an algorithm that recognizes the human’s task, replicates similar demonstrations, and returns control when unsure. We then combine learning with control to demonstrate that the error of our approach is uniformly ultimately bounded. We perform simulations to support this error bound, compare our approach to imitation learning baselines, and explore its capacity to assist for an increasing number of tasks. Finally, we conduct three user studies with industry-standard methods and shared autonomy baselines, including a pilot test with a disabled user. Our results indicate that learning shared autonomy across repeated interactions matches existing approaches for known tasks and outperforms baselines on new tasks. See videos of our user studies here: https://youtu.be/3vE4omSvLvc
  • Thumbnail Image
    Teaching Robots using Interactive Imitation Learning
    Jonnavittula, Ananth (Virginia Tech, 2024-06-28)
    As robots transition from controlled environments, such as industrial settings, to more dynamic and unpredictable real-world applications, the need for adaptable and robust learning methods becomes paramount. In this dissertation we develop Interactive Imitation Learning (IIL) based methods that allow robots to learn from imperfect demonstrations. We achieve this by incorporating human factors such as the quality of their demonstrations and the level of effort they are willing to invest in teaching the robot. Our research is structured around three key contributions. First, we examine scenarios where robots have access to high-quality human demonstrations and abundant corrective feedback. In this setup, we introduce an algorithm called SARI (Shared Autonomy across Repeated Interactions), that leverages repeated human-robot interactions to learn from humans. Through extensive simulations and real-world experiments, we demonstrate that SARI significantly enhances the robot's ability to perform complex tasks by iteratively improving its understanding and responses based on human feedback. Second, we explore scenarios where human demonstrations are suboptimal and no additional corrective feedback is provided. This approach acknowledges the inherent imperfections in human teaching and aims to develop robots that can learn effectively under such conditions. We accomplish this by allowing the robot to adopt a risk-averse strategy that underestimates the human's abilities. This method is particularly valuable in household environments where users may not have the expertise or patience to provide perfect demonstrations. Finally, we address the challenge of learning from a single video demonstration. This is particularly relevant for enabling robots to learn tasks without extensive human involvement. We present VIEW (Visual Imitation lEarning with Waypoints), a method that focuses on extracting critical waypoints from video demonstrations. By identifying key positions and movements, VIEW allows robots to efficiently replicate tasks with minimal training data. Our experiments show that VIEW can significantly reduce both the number of trials required and the time needed for the robot to learn new tasks. The findings from this research highlight the importance of incorporating advanced learning algorithms and interactive methods to enhance the robot's ability to operate autonomously in diverse environments. By addressing the variability in human teaching and leveraging innovative learning strategies, this dissertation contributes to the development of more adaptable, efficient, and user-friendly robotic systems.