Browsing by Author "Masuda, Yutaka"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Longitudinal genome-wide association analysis using a single-step random regression model for height in Japanese Holstein cattleBaba, Toshimi; Morota, Gota; Kawakami, Junpei; Gotoh, Yusaku; Oka, Taro; Masuda, Yutaka; Brito, Luiz F.; Cockrum, Rebecca R.; Kawahara, Takayoshi (American Dairy Science Association, 2023-07-13)Growth traits, such as body weight and height, are essential in the design of genetic improvement programs of dairy cattle due to their relationship with feeding efficiency, longevity, and health. We investigated genomic regions influencing height across growth stages in Japanese Holstein cattle using a single-step random regression model. We used 72,921 records from birth to 60 mo of age with 4,111 animals born between 2000 and 2016. The analysis included 1,410 genotyped animals with 35,319 single nucleotide polymorphisms, consisting of 883 females with records and 527 bulls, and 30,745 animals with pedigree information. A single genomic region at the 58.4 megabase pair on chromosome 18 was consistently identified across 6 age points of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mo after multiple testing corrections for the significance threshold. Twelve candidate genes, previously reported for longevity and gestation length, were found near the identified genomic region. Another location near the identified region was also previously associated with body conformation, fertility, and calving difficulty. Functional Gene Ontology enrichment analysis suggested that the candidate genes regulate dephosphorylation and phosphatase activity. Our findings show that further study of the identified candidate genes will contribute to a better understanding of the genetic basis of height in Japanese Holstein cattle.
- Modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUPBradford, Heather L.; Masuda, Yutaka; VanRaden, Paul M.; Legarra, Andres; Misztal, Ignacy (2019-03)The objective was to compare methods of modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Options for modeling missing pedigree included ignoring the missing pedigree, unknown parent groups (UPG) based on A (the numerator relationship matrix) or H (the unified pedigree and genomic relationship matrix), and metafounders. The assumptions for the distribution of estimated breeding values changed with the different models. We simulated data with heritabilities of 0.3 and 0.1 for dairy cattle populations that had more missing pedigrees for animals of lesser genetic merit. Predictions for the youngest generation and UPG solutions were compared with the true values for validation. For both traits, ssGBLUP with metafounders provided accurate and unbiased predictions for young animals while also appropriately accounting for genetic trend. Accuracy was least and bias was greatest for ssGBLUP with UPG for H for the trait with heritability of 0.3 and with UPG for A for the trait with heritability of 0.1. For the trait with heritability of 0.1 and UPG for H, the UPG accuracy (SD) was -0.49 (0.12), suggesting poor estimates of genetic trend despite having little bias for validations on young, genotyped animals. Problems with UPG estimates were likely caused by the lesser amount of information available for the lower heritability trait. Hence, UPG need to be defined differently based on the trait and amount of information. More research is needed to investigate accounting for UPG in A(22) to better account for missing pedigrees for genotyped animals.
- Modeling pedigree accuracy and uncertain parentage in single-step genomic evaluations of simulated and US Holstein datasetsBradford, Heather L.; Masuda, Yutaka; Cole, John B.; Misztal, Ignacy; VanRaden, Paul M. (2019-03)The objective of this study was to model differences in pedigree accuracy caused by selective genotyping. As genotypes are used to correct pedigree errors, some pedigree relationships are more accurate than others. These accuracy differences can be modeled with uncertain parentage models that distribute the paternal (maternal) contribution across multiple sires (dams). In our case, the parents were the parent on record and an unknown parent group to account for pedigree relationships that were not confirmed through genotypes. Pedigree accuracy was addressed through simulation and through North American Holstein data. Data were simulated to be representative of the dairy industry with heterogeneous pedigree depth, pedigree accuracy, and genotyping. Holstein data were obtained from the official evaluation for milk, fat, and protein. Two models were compared: the traditional approach, assuming accurate pedigrees, and uncertain parentage, assuming variable pedigree accuracy. The uncertain parentage model was used to add pedigree relationships for alternative parents when pedigree relationships were not certain. The uncertain parentage model included 2 possible sires (dams) when the sire (dam) could not be confirmed with genotypes. The 2 sires (dams) were the sire (dam) on record with probability 0.90 (0.95) and the unknown parent group for the birth year of the sire (dam) with probability 0.10 (0.05). An additional set of assumptions was tested in simulation to mimic an extensive dairy production system by using a sire probability of 0.75, a darn probability of 0.85, and the remainder attributed to the unknown parent groups. In the simulation, small bias differences occurred between models based on pedigree accuracy and genotype status. Rank correlations were strong between traditional and uncertain parentage models in simulation ( >= 0.99) and in Holstein ( >= 0.99). For Holsteins, the estimated breeding value differences between models were small for most animals. Thus, traditional models can continue to be used for dairy genomic prediction despite using genotypes to improve pedigree accuracy. Those genotypes can also be used to discover maternal parentage, specifically maternal grandsires and great grandsires when the dam is not known. More research is needed to understand how to use discovered maternal pedigrees in genetic prediction.