Browsing by Author "McLaughlin, Shane Brendan"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Analytic Assessment of Collision Avoidance Systems and Driver Dynamic Performance in Rear-End Crashes and Near-Crashes
    McLaughlin, Shane Brendan (Virginia Tech, 2007-10-30)
    Collision avoidance systems (CASs) are being developed and fielded to reduce the number and severity of rear-end crashes. Kinematic algorithms within CASs evaluate sensor input and apply assumptions describing human-response timing and deceleration to determine when an alert should be presented. This dissertation presents an analytic assessment of dynamic function and performance CASs and associated driver performance for preventing automotive rear-end crashes. A method for using naturalistic data in the evaluation of CAS algorithms is described and applied to three algorithms. Time-series parametric data collected during 13 rear-end crashes and 70 near-crashes are input into models of collision avoidance algorithms to determine when the alerts would have occurred. Algorithm performance is measured by estimating how much of the driving population would be able to respond in the time available between when an alert would occur and when braking was needed. A sensitivity analysis was performed to consider the effect of alternative inputs into the assessment method. The algorithms were found to warn in sufficient time to permit 50–70% of the population to avoid collision in similar scenarios. However, the accuracy of this estimate was limited because the tested algorithms were found to alert too frequently to be feasible. The response of the assessment method was most sensitive to differences in assumed response-time distributions and assumed driver braking levels. Low-speed crashes were not addressed by two of the algorithms. Analysis of the events revealed that the necessary avoidance deceleration based on kinematics was generally less than 2 s in duration. At the time of driver response, the time remaining to avoid collision using a 0.5g average deceleration ranged from â 1.1 s to 2.1 s. In 10 of 13 crashes, no driver response deceleration was present. Mean deceleration for the 70 near-crashes was 0.37g and maximum was 0.72g. A set of the events was developed to measure driver response time. The mean driver response time was 0.7 s to begin braking and 1.1 s to reach maximum deceleration. Implications for collision countermeasures are considered, response-time results are compared to previous distributions and future work is discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Measurement of Driver Preferences and Intervention Responses as Influenced by Adaptive Cruise Control Deceleration Characteristics
    McLaughlin, Shane Brendan (Virginia Tech, 1998-04-10)
    In comparison to conventional cruise control, adaptive cruise control (ACC) vehicles are capable of sensing forward traffic and slowing to accommodate as necessary. When no forward vehicles are present, ACC function is the same as conventional cruise control. However, with ACC, when a slower vehicle is detected, the ACC system will decelerate and follow at a selected time-based distance. While slowing to follow, the driver will experience a system-controlled deceleration of the ACC vehicle. An experiment was conducted to evaluate driver preferences for the distance at which the primary deceleration occurs and the level of deceleration that is obtained. Driver intervention was required in one trial and driver response behavior was measured. Ten men and ten women in two age groups evaluated the decelerations from a cruise speed of 70mph to a following speed of 55mph behind a confederate lead vehicle on the highway. Evaluations can be made using four scales: Good vs. Bad, Comfortable vs. Uncomfortable, Jerky vs. Smooth, and Early vs. Late. Decelerations of approximately 0.06g which occur approximately 200ft to 250ft behind the lead vehicle were most preferred. Prior to intervention, foot position ranged from a point directly below the brake pedal to 16.4in from the brake pedal. Foot motion began between 21.12s time-to-collision (TTC) and 3.97s TTC. Eighty percent of the participants paused to "cover" the brake before final motion to activate the brake. The older age group intervened (braked) later than the younger age group. Driver braking after intervention ranged from 0.16g to 0.32g.