Browsing by Author "Minear, J. Toby"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Advancing Field-Based GNSS Surveying for Validation of Remotely Sensed Water Surface Elevation Products
    Pitcher, Lincoln H.; Smith, Laurence C.; Cooley, Sarah W.; Zaino, Annie; Carlson, Robert; Pettit, Joseph; Gleason, Colin J.; Minear, J. Toby; Fayne, Jessica V.; Willis, Michael J.; Hansen, Jasmine S.; Easterday, Kelly J.; Harlan, Merritt E.; Langhorst, Theodore; Topp, Simon N.; Dolan, Wayana; Kyzivat, Ethan D.; Pietroniro, Al; Marsh, Philip; Yang, Daqing; Carter, Tom; Onclin, Cuyler; Hosseini, Nasim; Wilcox, Evan; Moreira, Daniel; Berge-Nguyen, Muriel; Cretaux, Jean-Francois; Pavelsky, Tamlin M. (Frontiers, 2020-11-23)
    To advance monitoring of surface water resources, new remote sensing technologies including the forthcoming Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite (expected launch 2022) and its experimental airborne prototype AirSWOT are being developed to repeatedly map water surface elevation (WSE) and slope (WSS) of the world’s rivers, lakes, and reservoirs. However, the vertical accuracies of these novel technologies are largely unverified; thus, standard and repeatable field procedures to validate remotely sensed WSE and WSS are needed. To that end, we designed, engineered, and operationalized a Water Surface Profiler (WaSP) system that efficiently and accurately surveys WSE and WSS in a variety of surface water environments using Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) time-averaged measurements with Precise Point Positioning corrections. Here, we present WaSP construction, deployment, and a data processing workflow. We demonstrate WaSP data collections from repeat field deployments in the North Saskatchewan River and three prairie pothole lakes near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. We find that WaSP reproducibly measures WSE and WSS with vertical accuracies similar to standard field survey methods [WSE root mean squared difference (RMSD) ∼8 cm, WSS RMSD ∼1.3 cm/km] and that repeat WaSP deployments accurately quantify water level changes (RMSD ∼3 cm). Collectively, these results suggest that WaSP is an easily deployed, self-contained system with sufficient accuracy for validating the decimeter-level expected accuracies of SWOT and AirSWOT. We conclude by discussing the utility of WaSP for validating airborne and spaceborne WSE mappings, present 63 WaSP in situ lake WSE measurements collected in support of NASA’s Arctic-Boreal and Vulnerability Experiment, highlight routine deployment in support of the Lake Observation by Citizen Scientists and Satellites project, and explore WaSP utility for validating a novel GNSS interferometric reflectometry LArge Wave Warning System.
  • Thumbnail Image
    A Framework for Estimating Global River Discharge From the Surface Water and Ocean Topography Satellite Mission
    Durand, Michael; Gleason, Colin J.; Pavelsky, Tamlin M.; Frasson, Renato Prata de Moraes D. M.; Turmon, Michael; David, Cedric H.; Altenau, Elizabeth H.; Tebaldi, Nikki; Larnier, Kevin; Monnier, Jerome; Malaterre, Pierre Olivier; Oubanas, Hind; Allen, George H.; Astifan, Brian; Brinkerhoff, Craig; Bates, Paul D.; Bjerklie, David; Coss, Stephen; Dudley, Robert; Fenoglio, Luciana; Garambois, Pierre-Andre; Getirana, Augusto; Lin, Peirong; Margulis, Steven A.; Matte, Pascal; Minear, J. Toby; Muhebwa, Aggrey; Pan, Ming; Peters, Daniel; Riggs, Ryan; Sikder, Md Safat; Simmons, Travis; Stuurman, Cassie; Taneja, Jay; Tarpanelli, Angelica; Schulze, Kerstin; Tourian, Mohammad J.; Wang, Jida (American Geophysical Union, 2023-04-06)
    The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission will vastly expand measurements of global rivers, providing critical new data sets for both gaged and ungaged basins. SWOT discharge products (available approximately 1 year after launch) will provide discharge for all river that reaches wider than 100 m. In this paper, we describe how SWOT discharge produced and archived by the US and French space agencies will be computed from measurements of river water surface elevation, width, and slope and ancillary data, along with expected discharge accuracy. We present for the first time a complete estimate of the SWOT discharge uncertainty budget, with separate terms for random (standard error) and systematic (bias) uncertainty components in river discharge time series. We expect that discharge uncertainty will be less than 30% for two-thirds of global reaches and will be dominated by bias. Separate river discharge estimates will combine both SWOT and in situ data; these “gage-constrained” discharge estimates can be expected to have lower systematic uncertainty. Temporal variations in river discharge time series will be dominated by random error and are expected to be estimated within 15% for nearly all reaches, allowing accurate inference of event flow dynamics globally, including in ungaged basins. We believe this level of accuracy lays the groundwork for SWOT to enable breakthroughs in global hydrologic science.