Browsing by Author "Mirsky, Steven B."
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Cover crop termination options and application of remote sensing for evaluating termination efficiencyKumar, Vipin; Singh, Vijay; Flessner, Michael L.; Haymaker, Joseph; Reiter, Mark S.; Mirsky, Steven B. (Public Library of Science, 2023-04-20)Efficient termination of cover crops is an important component of cover crop management. Information on termination efficiency can help in devising management plans but estimating herbicide efficacy is a tedious task and potential remote sensing technologies and vegetative indices (VIs) have not been explored for this purpose. This study was designed to evaluate potential herbicide options for the termination of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), cereal rye (Secale cereale L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.), and rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), and to correlate different VIs with visible termination efficiency. Nine herbicides and one roller-crimping treatment were applied to each cover crop. Among different herbicides used, glyphosate, glyphosate + glufosinate, paraquat, and paraquat + metribuzin provided more than 95% termination for both wheat and cereal rye 28 days after treatment (DAT). For hairy vetch, 2,4-D + glufosinate and glyphosate + glufosinate, resulted in 99 and 98% termination efficiency, respectively, followed by 2,4-D + glyphosate and paraquat with 92% termination efficiency 28 DAT. No herbicide provided more than 90% termination of rapeseed and highest control was provided by paraquat (86%), 2,4-D + glufosinate (85%), and 2,4-D + glyphosate (85%). Roller-crimping (without herbicide application) did not provide effective termination of any cover crop with 41, 61, 49, and 43% termination for wheat, cereal rye, hairy vetch, and rapeseed, respectively. Among the VIs, Green Leaf Index had the highest Pearson correlation coefficient for wheat (r = -0.786, p = <0.0001) and cereal rye (r = -0.804, p = <0.0001) with visible termination efficiency rating. Whereas for rapeseed, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) had the highest correlation coefficient (r = -0.655, p = <0.0001). The study highlighted the need for tankmixing 2,4-D or glufosinate with glyphosate for termination instead of blanket application of glyphosate alone for all crops including rapeseed and other broadleaf cover crops.
- Current outlook and future research needs for harvest weed seed control in North American cropping systemsShergill, Lovreet S.; Schwartz-Lazaro, Lauren M.; Leon, Ramon; Ackroyd, Victoria J.; Flessner, Michael L.; Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar V.; Everman, Wesley J.; Norsworthy, Jason K.; VanGessel, Mark J.; Mirsky, Steven B. (2020-12)Harvest weed seed control (HWSC) comprises a set of tools and tactics that prevents the addition of weed seed to the soil seed bank, attenuating weed infestations and providing a method to combat the development and spread of herbicide-resistant weed populations. Initial HWSC research efforts in North America are summarized and, combined with the vast area of crops suitable for HWSC, clearly indicate strong potential for this technology. However, potential limitations exist that are not present in Australian cropping systems where HWSC was developed. These include rotations with crops that are not currently amenable to HWSC (e.g. corn), high moisture content at harvest, untimely harvest, and others. Concerns about weeds becoming resistant to HWSC (i.e. adapting) exist, as do shifts in weed species composition, particularly with the diversity of weeds in North America. Currently the potential of HWSC vastly outweighs any drawbacks, necessitating further research. Such expanded efforts should foremost include chaff lining and impact mill commercial scale evaluation, as this will address potential limitations as well as economics. Growers must be integrated into large-scale, on-farm research and development activities aimed at alleviating the problems of using HWSC systems in North America and drive greater adoption subsequently. (c) 2020 Society of Chemical Industry
- Evaluation of integrated weed management techniques and their nuances in Virginia crop productionBeam, Shawn Christopher (Virginia Tech, 2019-11-04)Herbicide resistant weeds are driving implementation of integrated weed management (IWM). A new tactic to manage weeds is harvest weed seed control (HWSC), which targets weed seeds retained on the plant at crop harvest and either destroys, removes, or concentrates them. Research is limited on the effectiveness of HWSC in US cropping systems. For HWSC to be effective it is important to know when and how many seed are shed from a weed species in relation to crop harvest. Research was conducted to quantify when weed seed are shattered from 6 economically important weed species, four broadleaf (redroot pigweed, common ragweed, common lambsquarters, and common cocklebur) and two grass species (large crabgrass and giant foxtail). Results indicate that among summer annuals, broadleaf species retain larger proportions of their seed compared to grass species at the first opportunity for soybean harvest. As harvest was delayed, more seeds shattered from all species evaluated, indicating timely harvest is critical to maximizing HWSC effectiveness. Studies were conducted on grower fields in Virginia to evaluate the effectiveness of HWSC (field residue and weed seed removal). Results indicate that HWSC can significantly reduce populations of Italian ryegrass in wheat and common ragweed in soybean in the next growing season, but reductions were not observed for Palmer amaranth in soybean. Investigating IWM system for common ragweed control in soybean, HWSC was found to be less effective than soybean planting date (i.e. double cropping after wheat) at reducing common ragweed populations. However, the effectiveness of HWSC varied by location. If HWSC adoption were to become widespread, weeds could adapt by shedding seed earlier in the season. Research was conducted by growing Palmer amaranth populations from across the eastern US in a common garden. Currently there are differences in flowering time and seed shatter among Palmer amaranth populations based on the location of the maternal population, indicating potential for adaptation. This research demonstrates that HWSC is a viable option for weed management in US cropping systems but needs to be stewarded like any other weed management tool.
- Harvest weed seed control of Italian ryegrass [Lolium perenne L. ssp. multiflorum (Lam.) Husnot], common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson)Beam, Shawn C.; Mirsky, Steven B.; Cahoon, Charles W. Jr.; Haak, David C.; Flessner, Michael L. (2019-08)Herbicide resistance is a major problem in United States and global agriculture, driving farmers to consider other methods of weed control. One of these methods is harvest weed seed control (HWSC), which has been demonstrated to be effective in Australia. HWSC studies were conducted across Virginia in 2017 and 2018, targeting Italian ryegrass in continuous winter wheat as well as common ragweed and Palmer amaranth in continuous soybean. These studies assessed the impact of HWSC (via weed seed removal) on weed populations in the next year's crop compared with conventional harvest (weed seeds returned). HWSC reduced Italian ryegrass tillers compared with the conventional harvest at two locations in April (29% and 69%), but no difference was observed at a third location. At wheat harvest, HWSC at one location reduced Italian ryegrass seed heads (41 seed heads m(-2)) compared with conventional harvest (125 seed heads m(-2)). In soybean, before preplant herbicide applications and POST herbicide applications, HWSC reduced common ragweed densities by 22% and 26%, respectively, compared with the conventional harvest plots. By soybean harvest, no differences in common ragweed density, seed retention, or crop yield were observed, because of effectiveness of POST herbicides. No treatment differences were observed at any evaluation timing for Palmer amaranth, which is attributed to farmer weed management (i.e., effective herbicides) and low weed densities making any potential treatment differences difficult to detect. Across wheat and soybean, there were no differences observed in crop yield between treatments. Overall, HWSC was demonstrated to be a viable method to reduce Italian ryegrass and common ragweed populations.
- Influence of Cover Crop Termination Timing on its Volunteers and Weed SuppressionKumar, Vipin (Virginia Tech, 2023-01-19)Cover crops are widely planted in the mid-Atlantic region for their environmental and agronomic benefits, but incomplete or delayed termination can lead to cover crops becoming weeds in the subsequent cash crop, known as volunteers. Studies were conducted from 2020-2022 to evaluate the effect of four commonly grown cover crop species, winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), cereal rye (Secale cereal L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth), and rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), and four termination timings; 28, 14, 5, and 1 days before corn planting (DBP). Results indicated volunteerism was only an issue with rapeseed. Delaying rapeseed termination resulted in 0, 5, 12, and 22 volunteer plants m-2 at 28, 14, 5, and 1 DBP in corn. In order to manage these rapeseed volunteers, herbicide evaluations were conducted and indicated that atrazine, isoxaflutole, metribuzin, and pyroxasulfone resulted in 92-94% control when applied preemergence. Similarly, atrazine and glyphosate provided 99% rapeseed control and glufosinate resulted in 89% control when applied postemergence. Therefore, volunteers can easily be controlled with commonly used herbicides in corn. Studies were also conducted to evaluate the benefits of these cover crops, which have the potential to overcome the aforementioned risks. Results indicate that hairy vetch produced the most biomass and provided greater control of summer annual grasses, small-seeded broadleaf and large-seeded broadleaf weeds than other cover crops. Biomass accumulation and extent of weed control increased with delaying cover crop termination. Corn yield was greatest following hairy vetch and was least in rapeseed plots. Termination of cover crops 14 DBP planting increased corn yield by 12%; whereas termination at 1 DBP decreased corn yield by 15% as compared to no cover crop-no till plots. Effective termination of cover crops is an important management consideration and information on termination efficiency can help in devising management plans. In order to assist managers by evaluating cover crop termination efficiency, studies were conducted to evaluate selective and non-selective herbicides and a roller crimper for correlating vegetative indices with visible termination efficiency. Among vegetative indices, the Green Leaf Index had the highest Pearson correlation coefficient for wheat (r = -0.79, p = <0.0001) and cereal rye (r = -0.80, p = <0.0001) with visible termination efficiency. Whereas, for rapeseed, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) had the highest correlation coefficient (r = -0.66, p = <0.0001). However, for hairy vetch none of the vegetative indices correlated significantly with visible termination efficiency. While further research is necessary, remote sensing technologies may help in devising management plans by increasing crop scouting efficiency.
- Phenotypic and Nodule Microbial Diversity among Crimson Clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) AccessionsMoore, Virginia; Davis, Brian; Poskaitis, Megan; Maul, Jude E.; Kissing Kucek, Lisa; Mirsky, Steven B. (MDPI, 2020-09-21)Crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) is the most common legume cover crop in the United States. Previous research found limited genetic variation for crimson clover within the National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) collection. The aim of this study was to assess the phenotypic and nodule microbial diversity within the NPGS crimson clover collection, focusing on traits important for cover crop performance. Experiments were conducted at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (Maryland, USA) across three growing seasons (2012–2013, 2013–2014, 2014–2015) to evaluate 37 crimson clover accessions for six phenotypic traits: fall emergence, winter survival, flowering time, biomass per plant, nitrogen (N) content in aboveground biomass, and proportion of plant N from biological nitrogen fixation (BNF). Accession effect was significant across all six traits. Fall emergence of plant introductions (PIs) ranged from 16.0% to 70.5%, winter survival ranged from 52.8% to 82.0%, and growing degree days (GDD) to 25% maturity ranged from 1470 GDD to 1910 GDD. Biomass per plant ranged from 1.52 to 6.51 g, N content ranged from 1.87% to 2.24%, and proportion of plant N from BNF ranged from 50.2% to 85.6%. Accessions showed particularly clear differences for fall emergence and flowering time, indicating greater diversity and potential for selection in cover crop breeding programs. Fall emergence and winter survival were positively correlated, and both were negatively correlated with biomass per plant and plant N from BNF. A few promising lines performed well across multiple key traits, and are of particular interest as parents in future breeding efforts, including PIs 369045, 418900, 561943, 561944, and 655006. In 2014–2015, accessions were also assessed for nodule microbiome diversity, and 11 genera were identified across the sampled nodules. There was large variation among accessions in terms of species diversity, but this diversity was not associated with observed plant traits, and the functional implications of nodule microbiome diversity remain unclear.
- Seed-shattering phenology at soybean harvest of economically important weeds in multiple regions of the United States. Part 1: Broadleaf speciesSchwartz-Lazaro, Lauren M.; Shergill, Lovreet S.; Evans, Jeffrey A.; Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar V.; Beam, Shawn C.; Bish, Mandy D.; Bond, Jason A.; Bradley, Kevin W.; Curran, William S.; Davis, Adam S.; Everman, Wesley J.; Flessner, Michael L.; Haring, Steven C.; Jordan, Nicholas R.; Korres, Nicholas E.; Lindquist, John L.; Norsworthy, Jason K.; Sanders, Tameka L.; Steckel, Larry E.; VanGessel, Mark J.; Young, Blake; Mirsky, Steven B. (2021-01)Potential effectiveness of harvest weed seed control (HWSC) systems depends upon seed shatter of the target weed species at crop maturity, enabling its collection and processing at crop harvest. However, seed retention likely is influenced by agroecological and environmental factors. In 2016 and 2017, we assessed seed-shatter phenology in 13 economically important broadleaf weed species in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] from crop physiological maturity to 4 wk after physiological maturity at multiple sites spread across 14 states in the southern, northern, and mid-Atlantic United States. Greater proportions of seeds were retained by weeds in southern latitudes and shatter rate increased at northern latitudes. Amaranthus spp. seed shatter was low (0% to 2%), whereas shatter varied widely in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) (2% to 90%) over the weeks following soybean physiological maturity. Overall, the broadleaf species studied shattered less than 10% of their seeds by soybean harvest. Our results suggest that some of the broadleaf species with greater seed retention rates in the weeks following soybean physiological maturity may be good candidates for HWSC.
- Seed-shattering phenology at soybean harvest of economically important weeds in multiple regions of the United States. Part 2: Grass speciesSchwartz-Lazaro, Lauren M.; Shergill, Lovreet S.; Evans, Jeffrey A.; Bagavathiannan, Muthukumar V.; Beam, Shawn C.; Bish, Mandy D.; Bond, Jason A.; Bradley, Kevin W.; Curran, William S.; Davis, Adam S.; Everman, Wesley J.; Flessner, Michael L.; Haring, Steven C.; Jordan, Nicholas R.; Korres, Nicholas E.; Lindquist, John L.; Norsworthy, Jason K.; Sanders, Tameka L.; Steckel, Larry E.; VanGessel, Mark J.; Young, Blake; Mirsky, Steven B. (2021-01)Seed shatter is an important weediness trait on which the efficacy of harvest weed seed control (HWSC) depends. The level of seed shatter in a species is likely influenced by agroecological and environmental factors. In 2016 and 2017, we assessed seed shatter of eight economically important grass weed species in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] from crop physiological maturity to 4 wk after maturity at multiple sites spread across 11 states in the southern, northern, and mid-Atlantic United States. From soybean maturity to 4 wk after maturity, cumulative percent seed shatter was lowest in the southern U.S. regions and increased moving north through the states. At soybean maturity, the percent of seed shatter ranged from 1% to 70%. That range had shifted to 5% to 100% (mean: 42%) by 25 d after soybean maturity. There were considerable differences in seed-shatter onset and rate of progression between sites and years in some species that could impact their susceptibility to HWSC. Our results suggest that many summer annual grass species are likely not ideal candidates for HWSC, although HWSC could substantially reduce their seed output during certain years.
- Transdisciplinary weed research: new leverage on challenging weed problems?Jordan, N.; Schut, Marc; Grahan, S.; Barney, Jacob; Childs, D. Z.; Christensen, Svend; Cousens, R. D.; Davis, Adam S.; Eizenberg, Hanan; Ervin, D. E.; Fernandez-Quintanilla, Cesar; Harrison, L. J.; Harsch, M. A.; Heijting, Sanne; Liebman, M.; Loddo, Donato; Mirsky, Steven B.; Riemens, Marleen; Neve, Paul; Peltzer, Duane A.; Renton, Michael; Williams, Michael; Recasens, Jordi; Sonderskov, Mette (2016-10)Transdisciplinary weed research (TWR) is a promising path to more effective management of challenging weed problems. We define TWR as an integrated process of inquiry and action that addresses complex weed problems in the context of broader efforts to improve economic, environmental and social aspects of ecosystem sustainability. TWR seeks to integrate scholarly and practical knowledge across many stakeholder groups (e.g. scientists, private sector, farmers and extension officers) and levels (e.g. local, regional and landscape). Furthermore, TWR features democratic and iterative processes of decision-making and collective action that aims to align the interests, viewpoints and agendas of a wide range of stakeholders. The fundamental rationale for TWR is that many challenging weed problems (e.g. herbicide resistance or extensive plant invasions in natural areas) are better addressed systemically, as a part of broad-based efforts to advance ecosystem sustainability, rather than as isolated problems. Addressing challenging weed problems systemically can offer important new leverage on such problems, by creating new opportunities to manage their root causes and by improving complementarity between weed management and other activities. While promising, this approach is complicated by the multidimensional, multilevel, diversely defined and unpredictable nature of ecosystem sustainability. In practice, TWR can be undertaken as a cyclic process of (i) initial problem formulation, (ii) 'broadening' of the problem formulation and recruitment of stakeholder participants, (iii) deliberation, negotiation and design of an action agenda for systemic change, (iv) implementation action, (v) monitoring and assessment of outcomes and (vi) reformulation of the problem situation and renegotiation of further actions. Notably, 'purposive' disciplines (design, humanities and arts) have central, critical and recurrent roles in this process, as do integrative analyses of relevant multidimensional and multilevel factors, via multiple natural and social science disciplines. We exemplify this process in prospect and retrospect. Importantly TWR is not a replacement for current weed research; rather, the intent is to powerfully leverage current efforts.