Browsing by Author "Moorey, Sarah E."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Beef heifer fertility: importance of management practices and technological advancementsMoorey, Sarah E.; Biase, Fernando H. (2020-10-01)The development of replacement heifers is at the core of cow-calf beef production systems. In 2020, the USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service reported 5.771 million beef heifers, 500 pounds and over, are under development for cow replacement. A compilation of data from several studies indicate that between 85% and 95% of these heifers will become pregnant in their first breeding season. Several thousands of heifers being raised for replacement may not deliver a calf on their first breeding season and result in economic losses to cow-calf producers. Many management procedures have been developed to maximize the reproductive potential of beef heifers. Such approaches include, but are not limited to the following: nutritional management for controlled weight gain, identification of reproductive maturity by physiological and morphological indicators, and the implementation of an estrous synchronization program. The implementation of management strategies has important positive impact(s) on the reproductive efficiency of heifers. There are limitations, however, because some heifers deemed ready to enter their first breeding season do not become pregnant. In parallel, genetic selection for fertility-related traits in beef heifers have not promoted major genetic gains on this particular area, most likely due to low heritability of female fertility traits in cattle. Technologies such as antral follicle counting, DNA genotyping and RNA profiling are being investigated as a means to aid in the identification of heifers of low fertility potential. To date, many polymorphisms have been associated with heifer fertility, but no DNA markers have been identified across herds. Antral follicle count is an indication of the ovarian reserve and is an indicator of the reproductive health of a heifer. We have been working on the identification of transcriptome profiles in heifers associated with pregnancy outcome. Our current investigations integrating protein-coding transcript abundance and artificial intelligence have identified the potential for bloodborne transcript abundance to be used as indicators of fertility potential in beef heifers. In summary, there is an ongoing pressure for reducing costs and increasing efficiency in cow-calf production systems, and new technologies can help reduce the long-standing limitations in beef heifer fertility.
- Rewiring of gene expression in circulating white blood cells is associated with pregnancy outcome in heifers (Bos taurus)Moorey, Sarah E.; Walker, Bailey N.; Elmore, Michelle F.; Elmore, Joshua B.; Rodning, Soren P.; Biase, Fernando H. (2020-10-08)Infertility is a challenging phenomenon in cattle that reduces the sustainability of beef production worldwide. Here, we tested the hypothesis that gene expression profiles of protein-coding genes expressed in peripheral white blood cells (PWBCs), and circulating micro RNAs in plasma, are associated with female fertility, measured by pregnancy outcome. We drew blood samples from 17 heifers on the day of artificial insemination and analyzed transcript abundance for 10,496 genes in PWBCs and 290 circulating micro RNAs. The females were later classified as pregnant to artificial insemination, pregnant to natural breeding or not pregnant. We identified 1860 genes producing significant differential coexpression (eFDR<0.002) based on pregnancy outcome. Additionally, 237 micro RNAs and 2274 genes in PWBCs presented differential coexpression based on pregnancy outcome. Furthermore, using a machine learning prediction algorithm we detected a subset of genes whose abundance could be used for blind categorization of pregnancy outcome. Our results provide strong evidence that transcript abundance in circulating white blood cells is associated with fertility in heifers.
- Tight gene co-expression in BCB positive cattle oocytes and their surrounding cumulus cellsWalker, Bailey N.; Nix, Jada; Wilson, Chace; Marrella, Mackenzie A.; Speckhart, Savannah L.; Wooldridge, Lydia; Yen, Con-Ning; Bodmer, Jocelyn S.; Kirkpatrick, Laila T.; Moorey, Sarah E.; Gerrard, David E.; Ealy, Alan D.; Biase, Fernando H. (2022-08-13)Background Cytoplasmic and nuclear maturation of oocytes, as well as interaction with the surrounding cumulus cells, are important features relevant to the acquisition of developmental competence. Methods Here, we utilized Brilliant cresyl blue (BCB) to distinguish cattle oocytes with low activity of the enzyme Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase, and thus separated fully grown (BCB positive) oocytes from those in the growing phase (BCB negative). We then analyzed the developmental potential of these oocytes, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number in single oocytes, and investigated the transcriptome of single oocytes and their surrounding cumulus cells of BCB positive versus BCB negative oocytes. Results The BCB positive oocytes were twice as likely to produce a blastocyst in vitro compared to BCB- oocytes (P < 0.01). We determined that BCB negative oocytes have 1.3-fold more mtDNA copies than BCB positive oocytes (P = 0.004). There was no differential transcript abundance of genes expressed in oocytes, however, 172 genes were identified in cumulus cells with differential transcript abundance (FDR < 0.05) based on the BCB staining of their oocyte. Co-expression analysis between oocytes and their surrounding cumulus cells revealed a subset of genes whose co-expression in BCB positive oocytes (n = 75) and their surrounding cumulus cells (n = 108) compose a unique profile of the cumulus-oocyte complex. Conclusions If oocytes transition from BCB negative to BCB positive, there is a greater likelihood of producing a blastocyst, and a reduction of mtDNA copies, but there is no systematic variation of transcript abundance. Cumulus cells present changes in transcript abundance, which reflects in a dynamic co-expression between the oocyte and cumulus cells.