Browsing by Author "Moreira, Leandro M."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Novel insights into the genomic basis of citrus canker based on the genome sequences of two strains of Xanthomonas fuscans subsp aurantifoliiMoreira, Leandro M.; Almeida, Nalvo F.; Potnis, Neha; Digiampietri, Luciano A.; Adi, Said S.; Bortolossi, Julio C.; da Silva, Ana C.; da Silva, Aline M.; de Moraes, Fabrício E.; de Oliveira, Julio C.; de Souza, Robson F.; Facincani, Agda P.; Ferraz, André L.; Ferro, Maria I.; Furlan, Luiz R.; Gimenez, Daniele F.; Jones, Jeffrey B.; Kitajima, Elliot W.; Laia, Marcelo L.; Leite, Rui P., Jr; Nishiyama, Milton Y.; Rodrigues Neto, Julio; Nociti, Letícia A.; Norman, David J.; Ostroski, Eric H.; Pereira, Haroldo A. Jr.; Staskawicz, Brian J.; Tezza, Renata I.; Ferro, Jesus A.; Vinatzer, Boris A.; Setubal, João C. (Biomed Central, 2010-04-13)Background Citrus canker is a disease that has severe economic impact on the citrus industry worldwide. There are three types of canker, called A, B, and C. The three types have different phenotypes and affect different citrus species. The causative agent for type A is Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri, whose genome sequence was made available in 2002. Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. aurantifolii strain B causes canker B and Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. aurantifolii strain C causes canker C. Results We have sequenced the genomes of strains B and C to draft status. We have compared their genomic content to X. citri subsp. citri and to other Xanthomonas genomes, with special emphasis on type III secreted effector repertoires. In addition to pthA, already known to be present in all three citrus canker strains, two additional effector genes, xopE3 and xopAI, are also present in all three strains and are both located on the same putative genomic island. These two effector genes, along with one other effector-like gene in the same region, are thus good candidates for being pathogenicity factors on citrus. Numerous gene content differences also exist between the three cankers strains, which can be correlated with their different virulence and host range. Particular attention was placed on the analysis of genes involved in biofilm formation and quorum sensing, type IV secretion, flagellum synthesis and motility, lipopolysacharide synthesis, and on the gene xacPNP, which codes for a natriuretic protein. Conclusion We have uncovered numerous commonalities and differences in gene content between the genomes of the pathogenic agents causing citrus canker A, B, and C and other Xanthomonas genomes. Molecular genetics can now be employed to determine the role of these genes in plant-microbe interactions. The gained knowledge will be instrumental for improving citrus canker control.
- Origin and diversification of Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri pathotypes revealed by inclusive phylogenomic, dating, and biogeographic analysesPatané, José S. L.; Martins, Joaquim; Rangel, Luiz T.; Belasque, José; Digiampietri, Luciano A.; Facincani, Agda P.; Ferreira, Rafael M.; Jaciani, Fabrício J.; Zhang, Yunzeng; Varani, Alessandro M.; Almeida, Nalvo F.; Wang, Nian; Ferro, Jesus A.; Moreira, Leandro M.; Setubal, João C. (2019-09-09)Background Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri pathotypes cause bacterial citrus canker, being responsible for severe agricultural losses worldwide. The A pathotype has a broad host spectrum, while A* and Aw are more restricted both in hosts and in geography. Two previous phylogenomic studies led to contrasting well-supported clades for sequenced genomes of these pathotypes. No extensive biogeographical or divergence dating analytic approaches have been so far applied to available genomes. Results Based on a larger sampling of genomes than in previous studies (including six new genomes sequenced by our group, adding to a total of 95 genomes), phylogenomic analyses resulted in different resolutions, though overall indicating that A + AW is the most likely true clade. Our results suggest the high degree of recombination at some branches and the fast diversification of lineages are probable causes for this phylogenetic blurring effect. One of the genomes analyzed, X. campestris pv. durantae, was shown to be an A* strain; this strain has been reported to infect a plant of the family Verbenaceae, though there are no reports of any X. citri subsp. citri pathotypes infecting any plant outside the Citrus genus. Host reconstruction indicated the pathotype ancestor likely had plant hosts in the family Fabaceae, implying an ancient jump to the current Rutaceae hosts. Extensive dating analyses indicated that the origin of X. citri subsp. citri occurred more recently than the main phylogenetic splits of Citrus plants, suggesting dispersion rather than host-directed vicariance as the main driver of geographic expansion. An analysis of 120 pathogenic-related genes revealed pathotype-associated patterns of presence/absence. Conclusions Our results provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of X. citri subsp. citri as well as a sound phylogenetic foundation for future evolutionary and genomic studies of its pathotypes.