Browsing by Author "Navabpour, Shaghayegh"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are a Critical Regulator of Fear Memory ReconsolidationNavabpour, Shaghayegh; Rogers, Jessie; McFadden, Taylor; Jarome, Timothy J. (MDPI, 2020-11-26)Numerous studies have shown that following retrieval, a previously consolidated memory requires increased transcriptional regulation in order to be reconsolidated. Previously, it was reported that histone H3 lysine-4 trimethylation (H3K4me3), a marker of active transcription, is increased in the hippocampus after the retrieval of contextual fear memory. However, it is currently unknown how this epigenetic mark is regulated during the reconsolidation process. Furthermore, though recent evidence suggests that neuronal activity triggers DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in some early-response genes, it is currently unknown if DSBs contribute to the reconsolidation of a memory following retrieval. Here, using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analyses, we report a significant overlap between DSBs and H3K4me3 in area CA1 of the hippocampus during the reconsolidation process. We found an increase in phosphorylation of histone H2A.X at serine 139 (H2A.XpS139), a marker of DSB, in the Npas4, but not c-fos, promoter region 5 min after retrieval, which correlated with increased H3K4me3 levels, suggesting that the two epigenetic marks may work in concert during the reconsolidation process. Consistent with this, in vivo siRNA-mediated knockdown of topoisomerase II β, the enzyme responsible for DSB, prior to retrieval, reduced Npas4 promoter-specific H2A.XpS139 and H3K4me3 levels and impaired long-term memory, indicating an indispensable role of DSBs in the memory reconsolidation process. Collectively, our data propose a novel mechanism for memory reconsolidation through increases in epigenetic-mediated transcriptional control via DNA double-strand breaks.
- Epigenetic Mechanisms in Memory and Cognitive Decline Associated with Aging and Alzheimer's DiseaseMaity, Sabyasachi; Farrell, Kayla; Navabpour, Shaghayegh; Narayanan, Sareesh Naduvil; Jarome, Timothy J. (MDPI, 2021-11-13)Epigenetic mechanisms, which include DNA methylation, a variety of post-translational modifications of histone proteins (acetylation, phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, serotonylation, dopaminylation), chromatin remodeling enzymes, and long non-coding RNAs, are robust regulators of activity-dependent changes in gene transcription. In the brain, many of these epigenetic modifications have been widely implicated in synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Dysregulation of epigenetic mechanisms has been reported in the aged brain and is associated with or contributes to memory decline across the lifespan. Furthermore, alterations in the epigenome have been reported in neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease. Here, we review the diverse types of epigenetic modifications and their role in activity- and learning-dependent synaptic plasticity. We then discuss how these mechanisms become dysregulated across the lifespan and contribute to memory loss with age and in Alzheimer’s disease. Collectively, the evidence reviewed here strongly supports a role for diverse epigenetic mechanisms in memory formation, aging, and neurodegeneration in the brain.
- Females, but not males, require protein degradation in the hippocampus for contextual fear memory formationMartin, Kiley; Musaus, Madeline; Navabpour, Shaghayegh; Gustin, Aspen; Ray, W. Keith; Helm, Richard F.; Jarome, Timothy J. (2021-08)Strong evidence supports a role for protein degradation in fear memory formation. However, these data have been largely done in only male animals. Here, we found that following contextual fear conditioning, females, but not males, had increased levels of proteasome activity and K48 polyubiquitin protein targeting in the dorsal hippocampus, the latter of which occurred at chaperones or RNA processing proteins. In vivo CRISPR-dCas9-mediated repression of protein degradation in the dorsal hippocampus impaired contextual fear memory in females, but not males. These results suggest a sex-specific role for protein degradation in the hippocampus during the consolidation of a contextual fear memory.
- Phosphorylation of RPT6 Controls Its Ability to Bind DNA and Regulate Gene Expression in the Hippocampus of Male Rats during Memory FormationFarrell, Kayla; Auerbach, Aubrey; Musaus, Madeline; Navabpour, Shaghayegh; Liu, Catherine; Lin, Yu; Xie, Hehuang; Jarome, Timothy J. (Society for Neuroscience, 2024-01)Memory formation requires coordinated control of gene expression, protein synthesis, and ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS)-mediated protein degradation. The catalytic component of the UPS, the 26S proteasome, contains a 20S catalytic core surrounded by two 19S regulatory caps, and phosphorylation of the 19S cap regulatory subunit RPT6 at serine 120 (pRPT6-S120) has been widely implicated in controlling activity-dependent increases in proteasome activity. Recently, RPT6 was also shown to act outside the proteasome where it has a transcription factor-like role in the hippocampus during memory formation. However, little is known about the proteasome-independent function of “free” RPT6 in the brain or during memory formation and whether phosphorylation of S120 is required for this transcriptional control function. Here, we used RNA-sequencing along with novel genetic approaches and biochemical, molecular, and behavioral assays to test the hypothesis that pRPT6-S120 functions independently of the proteasome to bind DNA and regulate gene expression during memory formation. RNA-sequencing following siRNA-mediated knockdown of free RPT6 revealed 46 gene targets in the dorsal hippocampus of male rats following fear conditioning, where RPT6 was involved in transcriptional activation and repression. Through CRISPR-dCas9-mediated artificial placement of RPT6 at a target gene, we found that RPT6 DNA binding alone may be important for altering gene expression following learning. Further, CRISPR-dCas13-mediated conversion of S120 to glycine on RPT6 revealed that phosphorylation at S120 is necessary for RPT6 to bind DNA and properly regulate transcription during memory formation. Together, we reveal a novel function for phosphorylation of RPT6 in controlling gene transcription during memory formation.
- Proteomic Analysis Reveals Sex-Specific Protein Degradation Targets in the Amygdala During Fear Memory FormationFarrell, Kayla; Musaus, Madeline; Navabpour, Shaghayegh; Martin, Kiley; Ray, W. Keith; Helm, Richard F.; Jarome, Timothy J. (Frontiers, 2021-09-29)Ubiquitin-proteasome mediated protein degradation has been widely implicated in fear memory formation in the amygdala. However, to date, the protein targets of the proteasome remain largely unknown, limiting our understanding of the functional significance for protein degradation in fear memory formation. Additionally, whether similar proteins are targeted by the proteasome between sexes has yet to be explored. Here, we combined a degradation-specific K48 Tandem Ubiquitin Binding Entity (TUBE) with liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) to identify the target substrates of the protein degradation process in the amygdala of male and female rats following contextual fear conditioning. We found that males (43) and females (77) differed in the total number of proteins that had significant changes in K48 polyubiquitin targeting in the amygdala following fear conditioning. Many of the identified proteins (106) had significantly reduced levels in the K48-purified samples 1 h after fear conditioning, suggesting active degradation of the substrate due to learning. Interestingly, only 3 proteins overlapped between sexes, suggesting that targets of the protein degradation process may be sex-specific. In females, many proteins with altered abundance in the K48-purified samples were involved in vesicle transport or are associated with microtubules. Conversely, in males, proteins involved in the cytoskeleton, ATP synthesis and cell signaling were found to have significantly altered abundance. Only 1 protein had an opposite directional change in abundance between sexes, LENG1, which was significantly enhanced in males while lower in females. This suggests a more rapid degradation of this protein in females during fear memory formation. Interestingly, GFAP, a critical component of astrocyte structure, was a target of K48 polyubiquitination in both males and females, indicating that protein degradation is likely occurring in astrocytes following fear conditioning. Western blot assays revealed reduced levels of these target substrates following fear conditioning in both sexes, confirming that the K48 polyubiquitin was targeting these proteins for degradation. Collectively, this study provides strong evidence that sex differences exist in the protein targets of the degradation process in the amygdala following fear conditioning and critical information regarding how ubiquitin-proteasome mediated protein degradation may contribute to fear memory formation in the brain.
- Sex-Specific Linear Polyubiquitination Is a Critical Regulator of Contextual Fear Memory FormationMusaus, Madeline; Farrell, Kayla; Navabpour, Shaghayegh; Ray, W. Keith; Helm, Richard F.; Jarome, Timothy J. (Frontiers, 2021-07-09)Strong evidence supports that protein ubiquitination is a critical regulator of fear memory formation. However, as this work has focused on protein degradation, it is currently unknown whether polyubiquitin modifications that are independent of the proteasome are involved in learning-dependent synaptic plasticity. Here, we present the first evidence that atypical linear (M1) polyubiquitination, the only ubiquitin chain that does not occur at a lysine site and is largely independent of the proteasome, is critically involved in contextual fear memory formation in the amygdala in a sex-specific manner. Using immunoblot and unbiased proteomic analyses, we found that male (49) and female (14) rats both had increased levels of linear polyubiquitinated substrates following fear conditioning, though none of these protein targets overlapped between sexes. In males, target protein functions involved cell junction and axonal guidance signaling, while in females the primary target was Adiponectin A, a critical regulator of neuroinflammation, synaptic plasticity, and memory, suggesting sex-dependent functional roles for linear polyubiquitination during fear memory formation. Consistent with these increases, in vivo siRNA-mediated knockdown of Rnf31, an essential component of the linear polyubiquitin E3 complex LUBAC, in the amygdala impaired contextual fear memory in both sexes without affecting memory retrieval. Collectively, these results provide the first evidence that proteasome-independent linear polyubiquitination is a critical regulator of fear memory formation, expanding the potential roles of ubiquitin-signaling in learning-dependent synaptic plasticity. Importantly, our data identify a novel sex difference in the functional role of, but not a requirement for, linear polyubiquitination in fear memory formation.