Browsing by Author "Ndah, Tim Hycenth"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    The concept of the Qualitative Expert Assessment Tool for CA Adoption (QAToCA)
    Ndah, Tim Hycenth; Schuler, Johannes; Uthes, Sandra; Zander, Peter; Triomphe, Bernard (2011-11-01)
    Current research concerning conservation agriculture in Africa has indicated that numerous socio-economic, biological, and cultural factors may hinder its adoption and scalability. However, a severe knowledge gap about these conditions that serve as obstacles or catalysts for adoption exists in the developing world context. This paper describes the Qualitative Expert Assessment Tool for CA Adoption, a means by which to understand and predict CA adoption in Africa according to scale: field, farm and village, and region. This tool has been tested in Tunisia, Madagascar, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and Burkina Faso and is currently ready for use in all of Africa.
  • Understanding the impact and adoption of conservation agriculture in Africa: A multi-scale analysis
    Corbeels, Marc; de Graaff, Jan; Ndah, Tim Hycenth; Penota, Eric; Baudron, Frederic; Naudin, Krishna; Andrieua, Nadine; Chirata, Guillaume; Schuler, Johannes; Nyagumboe, Isaiah; Rusinamhodzi, Leonard; Traoref, Karim; Mzobag, Hamisi Dulla; Adolwah, Ivan Solomon (2014)
    Conservation agriculture (CA) has been lauded as a means for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa to increase yields through improving soil fertility and water retention. CA’s principles of minimum tillage, cover cropping, and crop rotations have been promoted in sub-Saharan Africa by many organizations, and significant resources have been invested in research and development initiatives devoted to CA. Despite this, adoption of CA in sub-Saharan Africa remains low. This article seeks to understand why this is true, and to come to a better comprehension of why, where, and for whom CA works best. To do so, the authors analyze several case studies of CA adoption projects in sub-Saharan Africa across four scales: field, farm, village, and region. Yield simulations are used to analyze the field scale, however, the authors point out that yield benefits are multifaceted and may not be well represented by simulations. Analysis of the farm and village scales find that both trade-offs and synergies exist between CA and livestock production systems, varying greatly by the farming context. A constraint identified at the regional level is the absence of input and output markets that are conducive to the adoption of CA. Although projects may provide inputs, farmers are left without access to inputs after the project ends, decreasing the likelihood that they will maintain CA practices. The authors indicate that, in order for CA adoption to move forward, initiatives must reach beyond agronomic research and seek to adapt CA to local conditions.