Browsing by Author "Norton, Anderson Hassell"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Facilitating Instructional Change: A Case Study on Diffusion of Curriculum InnovationMitchell, Corinne Beloved (Virginia Tech, 2023-08-15)While much research has been conducted on train-the-trainer models for diffusing curriculum innovations at the K-12 level, not much is known about how such models play out at the undergraduate level, especially with newer curriculum innovations using student-centered instruction. I present findings from one such project: a case study on the second-generation facilitation of a professional development group focused on supporting instructors teaching with the Inquiry-Oriented Abstract Algebra (Larsen et al., 2013) curriculum materials. I investigate the relationship between the intent of the instructional support model and the facilitator's beliefs and goals for the professional development, using video data collected from a series of online meetings and from the facilitator's classroom in the year prior to his facilitation. Results indicate that the facilitator's orientations and goals around sharing authority and creating supportive learning environments, especially for women participants, both modify and stabilize the intentions of the TIMES project (NSF Awards: #1431595, #1431641, #1431393) as a whole, and the train-the-trainer model as a subsidiary.
- A Lacanian Ideology Critique of Gender in Mathematics EducationMoore, Alexander Stone (Virginia Tech, 2023-09-14)In this study I employ Lacanian psychoanalysis and ideological criticism to analyze the development of "gender and mathematics" research over the past fifty years. This study is motivated by the original Marxist-Lacanian claim by Valerie Walkerdine in the 1980s that women's relationship with mathematics must always be considered as fundamentally problematic, and by the complex and often contradictory claims that are made in research artifacts that report on this topic. Many approaches to this topic that focus on "closing the gender gap" or aiming for "gender equity" warrant an ideological critique to situate these motivations within the political realm of mathematics education research. Artifacts analyzed in this study were gleaned from a comprehensive electronic library search of over 600 entries, where 178 were retained as yield. A complete ideological critique was performed on a subset of these. Findings include (1) historical alignment of the ideologies evidenced in the research with the ideological influences of the political situation at the time of publication, including scientism, neoliberalism, evolutionism, and solutionism, (2) the ideology of interpellationism which indicates the role of scientific ways of knowing in capitalist political economy, and (3) theoretical foundations of what I call the feminine-quilted-speech indicate how at the present moment in the field, we have the opportunity to shift the ideological underpinnings of research on gender and mathematics. The study avows the role of gender as an agent of capitalist accumulation in school mathematics, through a notion I develop called the masculine-quilted-speech.
- A Mixed Methods Study of Chinese Students' Construction of Fraction Schemes: Extending the Written Test with Follow-Up Clinical InterviewsXu, Cong Ze (Virginia Tech, 2023-01-12)Understanding fractions is fundamental for expanding number knowledge from the whole number system to the rational number system. According to the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000), learning fractions is an important mathematical goal for students in grades three through five in the U.S. Moreover, the NCTM suggests that fraction instruction start in Pre-K and continue through 8th grade. At the same time, the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM) suggests that fraction instruction should occur from Grade 3 to 7. In contrast to the time spent on learning fractions in the U.S., students in China spend a relatively short time learning fractions (Zhang and Siegler, 2022). According to the Chinese national curriculum standards, the Chinese National Mathematics Curriculum Standards (CNMCS) for five-four system, the fundamental fraction concepts are taught in grades 3 and 5 only. However, Chinese students continue to have higher performance on fraction items in international assessments when compared with American students (Fan and Zhu, 2004). Consequently, over the last several years, researchers have investigated subject content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of Chinese in-service teachers and pre-service teachers via fraction division (e.g., Li and Huang, 2008; Ma, 1999). There are also studies exploring Chinese written curricula of fraction division (e. g., Li, Zhang, and Ma, 2009). Recently, a quantitative study from Norton, Wilkins, and Xu (2018) investigated the process of Chinese students' construction of fraction knowledge through the lens of fraction schemes, a model established by western scholars Steffe (2002) and his colleague Olive (Steffe and Olive, 2010). However, there is a lack of qualitative research that attempts to use fraction schemes as an explanatory framework to interpret the process of Chinese students' construction of fraction knowledge. The main purpose of this study was to investigate Chinese students' understanding of the fundamental fraction knowledge in terms of their understanding of the "fraction unit," referred to as a "unit fraction" in the U.S., using Steffe and Olive's (2010) fraction schemes as the conceptual framework. A sequential mixed methods design was used in this study. The design included two consecutive phases, namely a quantitative phase followed by a qualitative phase (Creswell and Plano Clark, 2011). During the quantitative phase, five hundred and thirty-four Chinese fourth and fifth grade students were administered an assessment. The quantitative data was first analyzed using a Cochran's Q test to determine if the Chinese participants in this study follow the same progression of fraction schemes as their American peers. Results indicate that the development of fractional schemes among Chinese 4th and 5th grade participants in this study is similar to their U.S. counterparts and the Chinese participants in Norton et al.'s (2018) study regardless of the curricula differences across countries or areas in the same country, the textbook differences, and the language differences. Next, two different analysis of variances (ANOVA), a three-way mixed ANOVA and a two-way repeated measures ANOVA were conducted. The three-way mixed ANOVA was used to inform the researcher as to the fraction schemes these students had constructed before the concept of fraction unit is formally introduced and after the concept of fraction unit is formally introduced. The results showed that the fraction knowledge of the students in this study developed from 4th grade to 5th grade. The analysis of clinical interview data confirmed this conclusion. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine which model (i.e., linear, circular, or rectangular) is more or less problematic for Chinese students when solving fraction tasks. The results suggest that generally students' performance on linear model tasks was better than their performance on circular model tasks, but there was no statistically significant difference between performance on circular model and its corresponding rectangular model tasks. The results from the quantitative analyses were also used to screen students to form groups based on their highest available fraction scheme for a clinical interview in the second phase, the qualitative phase. In the qualitative phase, a clinical interview using a think-aloud method was used to gain insight into the role of students' conceptual understanding of the fraction unit in their construction of fraction knowledge. In this phase, students were asked to solve the tasks in the clinical interview protocol using the think aloud method. Two main findings were revealed analyzing the clinical interview data. First, a conceptual understanding of fraction units as well as a conceptual understanding of a unit whole play a critical role in the construction of Chinese students' fraction knowledge. Second, the lack of the understanding of a fraction unit as an iterable unit may be one of the reasons that obstructs students move from part-whole concept of fractions to the measurement concept of fractions. This study also demonstrates that a conceptual understanding of fraction units and the unit whole are a necessary condition for constructing of a conceptual understanding of fraction knowledge. Thus, implications of this study suggest that teachers not only should help students build a conceptual understanding of fraction units, but also need to confirm that students have constructed the concept of what the unit whole is before asking students to identify the fraction units for the referent whole. On the other hand, the tasks used in the present study only include continuous but not discrete wholes. Therefore, future research may focus on investigating how students identify fraction units and in what way the iterating operation could be used when students encounter a discrete whole.
- Modeling Middle Grade Students' Algebraic and Covariational Reasoning using Unit Transformations and Working MemoryKerrigan, Sarah Therese (Virginia Tech, 2023-02-07)Quantitative reasoning permeates mathematical thinking, and mathematics education researchers have taken a quantitative reasoning approach to examining and modeling students' mathematical thinking and development in various domains. From this approach, secondary and post-secondary researchers have focused on students' ability to reason about how two quantities vary together (covariational reasoning). However, little is known about how covariational reasoning develops from, or connects with, arithmetic and algebraic reasoning. This study begins to bridge the gap in this knowledge. Originally this study was designed to examine middle grade students' units coordination in covariational reasoning across stages and consider the cognitive limiting factor of working memory. In this case study of Daniel, an advanced Stage 2 middle-grade algebra student, I examined the role his units coordinating structures played in his covariational reasoning in non-graphing and algebra tasks. I considered three main components in covariational reasoning (type of quantity, modality of change, and role of time) when analyzing covariational reasoning and capturing the underlying mental units and actions. I found type of quantity and time were the two biggest factors when determining Daniel's covariational reasoning. Daniel also used his units coordinating structures in various ways in the different covariation tasks, generating three different types of change units that were cognitively structurally different. These findings suggest cognitive connections between the types of units a student assimilates with, and the types of covariational reasoning they engage in, are interconnected and warrant future study.
- Professional Mathematicians' Level of Understanding: An Investigation of Pseudo-ObjectificationFlanagan, Kyle Joseph (Virginia Tech, 2023-12-20)This research study investigated how professional mathematicians understand and operate with highly-abstract, advanced mathematical concepts in their own work. In particular, this study examined how professional mathematicians operated with mathematical concepts at different levels of understanding. Moreover, this study aimed to capture what factors influence professional mathematicians' level of understanding for particular mathematical concepts. To frame these research goals, three theoretical levels of understanding were proposed, process-level, pseudo-object-level, object-level, leveraging two ways that Piaget (1964) described what it meant to know or understand a mathematical concept. Specifically, he described understanding an object as being able to "act on it," and also as being able to "understand the process of this transformation" (p. 176). Process-level understanding corresponds to only understanding the underlying processes of the concept. Pseudo-object-level understanding corresponds to only being able to act on the concept as a form of object. Object-level understanding corresponds to when an individual has both of these types of understanding. This study is most especially concerned with how professional mathematicians operate with a pseudo-object-level understanding, which is called pseudo-objectification. For this study, six professional mathematicians with research specializing in a subfield of algebra were each interviewed three times. During the first interview, the participants were given two mathematical tasks, utilizing concepts in category theory which were unfamiliar to the participants, to investigate how they operate with mathematical concepts. The second interview utilized specific journal publications from each participant to generate discussion about influences on their level of understanding for the concepts in that journal article. The third interview utilized stimulated recall to triangulate and support the findings from the first two interviews. The findings and analysis revealed that professional mathematicians do engage in pseudo-objectification with mathematical concepts. This demonstrates that pseudo-objectification can be productively leveraged by professional mathematicians. Moreover, depending on their level of understanding for a given concept, they may operate differently with the concept. For example, when participants utilized pseudo-objects, they tended to rely on figurative material, such as commutative diagrams, to operate on the concepts. Regarding influences on understanding, various factors were shown to influence professional mathematicians' level of understanding for the concepts they use in their own work. These included factors pertaining to the mathematical concept itself, as well as other sociocultural or personal factors.
- Prospective Teachers' Knowledge of Secondary and Abstract Algebra and their Use of this Knowledge while Noticing Students' Mathematical ThinkingSerbin, Kaitlyn Stephens (Virginia Tech, 2021-08-03)I examined the development of three Prospective Secondary Mathematics Teachers' (PSMTs) understandings of connections between concepts in Abstract Algebra and high school Algebra, as well as their use of this understanding while engaging in the teaching practice of noticing students' mathematical thinking. I drew on the theory, Knowledge of Nonlocal Mathematics for Teaching, which suggests that teachers' knowledge of advanced mathematics can become useful for teaching when it first helps reshape their understanding of the content they teach. I examined this reshaping process by investigating how PSMTs extended, deepened, unified, and strengthened their understanding of inverses, identities, and binary operations over time. I investigated how the PSMTs' engagement in a Mathematics for Secondary Teachers course, which covered connections between inverse functions and equation solving and the abstract algebraic structures of groups and rings, supported the reshaping of their understandings. I then explored how the PSMTs used their mathematical knowledge as they engaged in the teaching practice of noticing hypothetical students' mathematical thinking. I investigated the extent to which the PSMTs' noticing skills of attending, interpreting, and deciding how to respond to student thinking developed as their mathematical understandings were reshaped. There were key similarities in how the PSMTs reshaped their knowledge of inverse, identity, and binary operation. The PSMTs all unified the additive identity, multiplicative identity, and identity function as instantiations of the same overarching identity concept. They each deepened their understanding of inverse functions. They all unified additive, multiplicative, and function inverses under the overarching inverse concept. They also strengthened connections between inverse functions, the identity function, and function composition. They all extended the contexts in which their understandings of inverses were situated to include trigonometric functions. These changes were observed across all the cases, but one change in understanding was not observed in each case: one PSMT deepened his understanding of the identity function, whereas the other two had not yet conceptualized the identity function as a function in its own right; rather, they perceived it as x, the output of the composition of inverse functions. The PSMTs had opportunities to develop these understandings in their Mathematics for Secondary Teachers course, in which the instructor led the students to reason about the inverse and identity group axioms and reflect on the structure of additive, multiplicative, and compositional inverses and identities. The course also covered the use of inverses, identities, and binary operations used while performing cancellation in the context of equation solving. The PSMTs' noticing skills improved as their mathematical knowledge was reshaped. The PSMTs' reshaped understandings supported them paying more attention to the properties and strategies evident in a hypothetical student's work and know which details were relevant to attend to. The PSMTs' reshaped understandings helped them more accurately interpret a hypothetical student's understanding of the properties, structures, and operations used in equation solving and problems about inverse functions. Their reshaped understandings also helped them give more accurate and appropriate suggestions for responding to a hypothetical student in ways that would build on and improve the student's understanding.
- The Role of Students' Gestures in Offloading Cognitive Demands on Working Memory in Proving ActivitiesKokushkin, Vladislav (Virginia Tech, 2023-02-03)This study examines how undergraduate students use hand gestures to offload cognitive demands on their working memory (WM) when they are engaged in three major proving activities: reading, presenting, and constructing proofs of mathematical conjectures. Existing research literature on the role of gesturing in cognitive offloading has been limited to the context of elementary mathematics but has shown promise for extension to the college level. My framework weaves together theoretical constructs from mathematics education and cognitive psychology: gestures, WM, and mathematical proofs. Piagetian and embodied perspectives allow for the integration of these constructs through positioning bodily activity at the core of human cognition. This framework is operationalized through the methodology for measuring cognitive demands of proofs, which is used to identify the set of mental schemes that are activated simultaneously, as well as the places of potential cognitive overload. The data examined in this dissertation includes individual clinical interviews with six undergraduate students enrolled in different sections of the Introduction to Proofs course in Fall 2021 and Spring 2022. Each student participated in seven interviews: two WM assessments, three proofs-based interviews, a stimulated recall interview (SRI), and post-interview assessments. In total, 42 interviews were conducted. The participants' hand gesturing and mathematical reasoning were qualitatively analyzed. Ultimately, students' reflections during SRIs helped me triangulate the initial data findings. The findings suggest that, in absence of other forms of offloading, hand gesturing may become a convenient, powerful, although not an exclusive offloading mechanism: several participants employed alternative mental strategies in overcoming the cognitive overload they experienced. To better understand what constitutes the essence of cognitive offloading via hand gesturing, I propose a typology of offloading gestures. This typology differs from the existing classification schemes by capturing the cognitive nuances of hand gestures rather than reflecting their mechanical characteristics or the underlying mathematical content. Employing the emerged typology, I then show that cognitive offloading takes different forms when students read or construct proofs, and when they present proofs to the interviewer. Finally, I report on some WM-related issues in presenting and constructing proofs that can be attributed to the potential side effects of mathematical chunking. The dissertation concludes with a discussion of the limitations and practical implications of this project, as well as foreshadowing the avenues for future research.
- Teachers' Reflection on Inquiry-Oriented Instruction in Online Professional DevelopmentKelley, Marilin Annie (Virginia Tech, 2021-01-11)In light of the expansion of student-centered instructional approaches in mathematics education and a brightening spotlight on virtual teacher supports, I look to Inquiry-Oriented Instruction (IOI) and explore how instructors reflect on and plan for their implementation of IOI in online professional development. I focus specifically on two teachers' comments on their implementation of IOI materials covering Abstract Algebra topics in online work groups developed to support teachers in implementing IOI. I analyze both reflection and enactment through the components of IOI characterized through the Instructional Triangle. Analysis of the teachers' reflections, viewed through their participation in the roles of sense maker, inquirer, and builder, revealed interesting differences in the teachers' approaches to IOI. I detail these two teachers' approaches to IOI and ultimately shed light on the intricacies of IOI and online professional development. Such findings support the growing bodies of research centered around IOI and corresponding professional development.