Browsing by Author "Pieper, Kelsey J."

Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
  • Thumbnail Image
    Challenges of Detecting Lead in Drinking Water Using at-Home Test Kits
    Kriss, Rebecca; Pieper, Kelsey J.; Parks, Jeffrey L.; Edwards, Marc A. (2021-02-02)
    Lead in drinking water remains a significant human health risk. At-home lead in water test kits could provide consumers with a convenient and affordable option to evaluate this risk, but their accuracy and reliability is uncertain. This study examined the ability of at-home lead test kits to detect varying concentrations of dissolved and particulate lead in drinking water. Sixteen brands representing four test kit types (binary color, binary strip, colorimetric vial, and color strip) were identified. Most kits (12 of 16 brands) were not suitable for drinking water analysis, with lead detection limits of 5-20 mg/L. Binary strips detected dissolved lead at drinking water-relevant levels but failed to detect particulate lead. Household acids (lemon juice and vinegar) improved the strip's ability to detect lead by dissolving some of the lead particulates to the point soluble lead exceeded 15 mu g/L. These results illustrate the applications of at-home testing kits for drinking water analysis, highlight limitations and areas for possible improvement, and put forth a testing protocol by which new at-home lead test kits can be judged.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Characterization of opportunistic Pathogens in Drinking Water Supplied by Private Wells
    Mapili, Kristine Irene Manzano (Virginia Tech, 2019-07-03)
    Private wells are understudied potential sources of opportunistic pathogen (OP) infections. OPs, including Legionella and Mycobacterium, are of particular concern for immunocompromised individuals and are known to proliferate in drinking water systems. Much of our knowledge surrounding OP occurrence and growth in drinking water relates to municipal drinking water systems, which primarily use surface water sources and are always treated with primary and secondary disinfection in United States. However, OP occurrence and growth in private wells is not well understood and it is unclear how the knowledge developed in municipal systems will translate to private well systems with rare and infrequent exposure to chemical disinfectants. In addition, because private wells are more susceptible to microbial contamination than municipal systems, the impact of flooding on OP occurrence is of particular concern. Two private well field surveys were conducted to document the incidence of OPs in private well systems. One survey conducted in North Carolina private wells with no history of recent flooding was focused on molecular and culture-based detection of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila. The other survey was a broader molecular (i.e., DNA-based) characterization of the incidence of Legionella spp., L. pneumophila, Mycobacterium spp., Mycobacterium avium (the most commonly nontuberculous mycobacteria associated with disease), and Naegleria fowleri in private wells with recent history of flooding (i.e., Hurricanes Harvey and Irma in 2017, or the Great Louisiana Floods in 2016, extending to Texas, Florida, and Louisiana). All samples in both studies were analyzed for total bacterial 16S rRNA genes, indicator bacteria (e.g., total coliform and Escherichia coli) and inorganic constituents. Information about well system characteristics were obtained through questionnaires sent to participating residents. Widespread detection of OP DNA markers were noted in the flooded well survey. Legionella spp. (detectable in 50-100% of well waters, depending on the flood event) and Mycobacterium spp. (detectable in 13.2-45.0% of well waters) were the most commonly detected among the OPs targets. At the genus level, L. pneumophila (7.9-65.5%) and M. avium (7.9-32.5%) were less commonly detected, but still highly variable. It is not possible to judge whether these OP levels were elevated as a result of the flooding because the sampling was carried out as an emergency response and background levels were not previously tested. Also of interest was whether well characteristics could predict OP levels, including well depth, well type, or treatment. However, none of these emerged as significant predictors of OP detection frequency or levels. Similarly, these OP DNA markers were not elevated in homes reporting submerged wellheads or system damage, suggesting that detection of these OPs is more dependent on the groundwater that supplies these private wells than influx of contaminated surface water. The incidence of DNA markers pertaining to N. fowleri, the "brain eating amoeba" that causes rare incidences of primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), tended to be lower (5.0-12.7%) than that of other OPs targeted, but was more frequently detected in wells reporting submerged well heads, suggesting its occurrence was related to contamination from flood water. A positive association between total bacteria and occurrence of both Legionella spp. and Mycobacterium spp., was observed in private wells of all surveyed areas, contrary to observations in municipal drinking water systems with secondary disinfectant residuals. On the other hand, Legionella reportedly has an optimal growth range of 20-42 °C in municipal systems and recent surveys of municipal systems reported a strong association between Legionella spp. and temperature that was not observed for private wells in this study. We speculate that the essentially "infinite" water age and lack of disinfectant for well water, may contribute to these differences relative to municipal water supplies. The results presented in this work are likely an overestimation of OPs numbers in private wells, as molecular detection of OPs does not distinguish between live and dead cells. In addition, sample sizes were limited by laboratory throughput and budget. Identifying key variables impacting the occurrence of OPs in private wells, given that our study shows that these pathogens are relatively common, might someday help limit the risk of infections.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Characterizing Waterborne Lead in Private Water Systems
    Pieper, Kelsey J. (Virginia Tech, 2015-07-21)
    Lead is a common additive in plumbing components despite its known adverse health effects. Recent research has attributed cases of elevated blood lead levels in children and even fetal death with the consumption of drinking water containing high levels of lead. Although the federal Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) strives to minimize lead exposure from water utilities through the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR), an estimated 47 million U.S. residents reliant on private unregulated water systems (generally individual and rural) are not protected. Detection, evaluation, and mitigation of lead in private systems is challenging due to lack of monitoring data, appropriate sampling protocols, and entities to fund research. Through a statewide sampling survey, over 2,000 homeowners submitted water samples for analysis. This survey documented that 19% of households had lead concentrations in the first draw sample (i.e., 250 mL sample collected after 6+ hours of stagnation) above the EPA action level of 15, with concentrations as high as 24,740. Due to the high incidence observed, this research focused on identifying system and household characteristics that increased a homeowner's susceptibility of lead in water. However, 1% of households had elevated lead concentrations after flushing for five minutes, which highlighted potential sources of lead release beyond the faucet. Therefore, a follow-up study was conducted to investigate sources and locations of lead release throughout the entire plumbing network. Using profiling techniques (i.e., sequential and time series sampling), three patterns of waterborne lead release were identified: no elevated lead or lead elevated in the first draw of water only (Type I), erratic spikes of particulate lead mobilized from plumbing during periods of water use (Type II), and sustained detectable lead concentrations (>1 ) even with extensive flushing (Type III). Lastly, emphasis was given to understand potential lead leaching from NSF Standard 61 Section 9 certified lead-free plumbing components as the synthetic test water is not representative of water quality observed in private water systems. Overall, this dissertation research provides insight into a population that is outside the jurisdiction of many federal agencies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Considerations for large building water quality after extended stagnation
    Proctor, Caitlin R.; Rhoads, William J.; Keane, Tim; Salehi, Maryam; Hamilton, Kerry; Pieper, Kelsey J.; Cwiertny, David M.; Prévost, Michèle; Whelton, Andrew J. (Wiley, 2020-06-09)
    The unprecedented number of building closures related to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is concerning because water stagnation will occur in many buildings that do not have water management plans in place. Stagnant water can have chemical and microbiological contaminants that pose potential health risks to occupants. Health officials, building owners, utilities, and other entities are rapidly developing guidance to address this issue, but the scope, applicability, and details included in the guidance vary widely. To provide a primer of large building water system preventative and remedial strategies, peer-reviewed, government, industry, and nonprofit literature relevant to water stagnation and decontamination practices for plumbing was synthesized. Preventative practices to help avoid the need for recommissioning (e.g., routine flushing) and specific actions, challenges, and limitations associated with recommissioning were identified and characterized. Considerations for worker and occupant safety were also indicated. The intended audience of this work includes organizations developing guidance.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Effectiveness of Prevailing Flush Guidelines to Prevent Exposure to Lead in Tap Water
    Katner, Adrienne; Pieper, Kelsey J.; Brown, Komal; Lin, Hui-Yi; Parks, Jeffrey L.; Wang, Xinnan; Hu, Chih-Yang; Masters, Sheldon; Mielke, Howard; Edwards, Marc A. (MDPI, 2018-07-20)
    Flushing tap water is promoted as a low cost approach to reducing water lead exposures. This study evaluated lead reduction when prevailing flush guidelines (30 s–2 min) are implemented in a city compliant with lead-associated water regulations (New Orleans, LA, USA). Water samples (n = 1497) collected from a convenience sample of 376 residential sites (2015–2017) were analyzed for lead. Samples were collected at (1) first draw (n = 375) and after incremental flushes of (2) 30–45 s (n = 375); (3) 2.5–3 min (n = 373), and (4) 5.5–6 min (n = 218). There was a small but significant increase in water lead after the 30 s flush (vs. first draw lead). There was no significant lead reduction until the 6 min flush (p < 0.05); but of these samples, 52% still had detectable lead (≥1 ppb). Older homes (pre-1950) and low occupancy sites had significantly higher water lead (p < 0.05). Each sample type had health-based standard exceedances in over 50% of sites sampled (max: 58 ppb). While flushing may be an effective short-term approach to remediate high lead, prevailing flush recommendations are an inconsistently effective exposure prevention measure that may inadvertently increase exposures. Public health messages should be modified to ensure appropriate application of flushing, while acknowledging its short-comings and practical limitations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Evaluating Water Lead Levels During the Flint Water Crisis
    Pieper, Kelsey J.; Martin, Rebekah L.; Tang, Min; Walters, LeeAnne; Parks, Jeffrey L.; Roy, Siddhartha; Devine, Christina; Edwards, Marc A. (ACS, 2018-06-22)
    In April 2014, the drinking water source in Flint, Michigan was switched from Lake Huron water with phosphate inhibitors to Flint River water without corrosion inhibitors. The absence of corrosion control and use of a more corrosive source increased lead leaching from plumbing. Our city-wide citizen science water lead results contradicted official claims that there was no problem– our 90th percentile was 26.8 μg/L, which was almost double the Lead and Copper Rule action level of 15 μg/L. Back calculations of a LCR sampling pool with 50% lead pipes indicated an estimated 90th percentile lead value of 31.7 μg/L (±4.3 μg/L). Four subsequent sampling efforts were conducted to track reductions in water lead after the switch back to Lake Huron water and enhanced corrosion control. The incidence of water lead varied by service line material. Between August 2015 and November 2016, median water lead reduced from 3.0 to <1 μg/L for homes with copper service lines, 7.2–1.9 μg/L with galvanized service lines, and 9.9–2.3 μg/L with lead service lines. As of summer 2017, our 90th percentile of 7.9 μg/L no longer differed from official results, which indicated Flint’s water lead levels were below the action level.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Indicators of Lead in Well Water
    Edwards, Marc A.; Pieper, Kelsey J. (Virginia Cooperative Extension, 2016-12-13)
    Shares information about lead in well water, and the importance of having the water tested for lead.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Tracking reduction of water lead levels in two homes during the Flint Federal Emergency
    Mantha, Anurag; Tang, Min; Pieper, Kelsey J.; Parks, Jeffrey L.; Edwards, Marc A. (2020-05-01)
    A Federal Emergency was declared in Flint, MI, on January 16, 2016, 18-months after a switch to Flint River source water without phosphate corrosion control. Remedial actions to resolve the corresponding lead in water crisis included reconnection to the original Lake Huron source water with orthophosphate, implementing enhanced corrosion control by dosing extra orthophosphate, a "Flush for Flint" program to help clean out loose leaded sediment from service lines and premise plumbing, and eventually lead service line replacement. Independent sampling over a period of 37 months (January 2016eFebruary 2019) was conducted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Virginia Tech to evaluate possible human exposure via normal flow (2e3 L/min) sampling at the cold kitchen tap, and to examine the status of loose deposits from the service line and the premise plumbing via high-velocity flushing (12e13 L/min) from the hose bib. The sampling results indicated that high lead in water persisted for more than a year in two Flint homes due to a large reservoir of lead deposits. The effects of a large reservoir of loose lead deposits persisted until the lead service line was completely removed in these two anomalous homes. As water conservation efforts are implemented in many areas of the country, problems with mobile lead reservoirs in service lines are likely to pose a human health risk.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Understanding Failure Modes of NSF/ANSI 53 Lead-Certified Point-of-Use Pitcher and Faucet Filters
    Purchase, Jeannie M.; Rouillier, Rusty; Pieper, Kelsey J.; Edwards, Marc A. (2021-02-09)
    NSF/ANSI 53 lead-certified point-of-use filters (POUs) have been distributed to consumers in many cities facing lead-in-water crises including Washington, D.C., Flint, MI, Newark, NJ, and University Park, IL. After questions repeatedly arose about POU effectiveness in treating samples with relatively high levels of lead, we examined 10 POU pitcher and faucet filter brands under extreme conditions (e.g., <= 200% of rated capacity, influent lead levels of approximate to 1000 mu g/L). Our tests sought to validate the successful performance documented in some field testing and replicate the underperformance observed in others. While verifying very good performance (i.e., <10 mu g/L effluent lead) across most brands and situations, we encountered a few failures, including leaking units, premature clogging, and a filter with a large hole in the medium. We also synthesized waters with colloidal lead that proved to be especially difficult to treat, as evidenced by 50% of influent lead passing through some replicate POUs that would have passed NSF/ANSI 53 lead certification testing. While the POUs almost always dramatically reduced consumer lead exposure level, even when operated beyond their rated capacity, this study highlights instances in which treated water exceeded thresholds of 5, 10, and even 15 mu g/L lead.