Browsing by Author "Plaxco, David Bryant"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Relating Understanding of Inverse and Identity to Engagement in Proof in Abstract AlgebraPlaxco, David Bryant (Virginia Tech, 2015-09-05)In this research, I set out to elucidate the relationships that might exist between students' conceptual understanding upon which they draw in their proof activity. I explore these relationships using data from individual interviews with three students from a junior-level Modern Algebra course. Each phase of analysis was iterative, consisting of iterative coding drawing on grounded theory methodology (Charmaz, 2000, 2006; Glaser and Strauss, 1967). In the first phase, I analyzed the participants' interview responses to model their conceptual understanding by drawing on the form/function framework (Saxe, et al., 1998). I then analyzed the participants proof activity using Aberdein's (2006a, 2006b) extension of Toulmin's (1969) model of argumentation. Finally, I analyzed across participants' proofs to analyze emerging patterns of relationships between the models of participants' understanding of identity and inverse and the participants' proof activity. These analyses contributed to the development of three emerging constructs: form shifts in service of sense-making, re-claiming, and lemma generation. These three constructs provide insight into how conceptual understanding relates to proof activity.
- Relationship Between Students' Proof Schemes and DefinitionsPlaxco, David Bryant (Virginia Tech, 2011-05-04)This research investigates relationships between undergraduate students' understanding of proof and how this understanding relates to their conceptions of mathematical definitions. Three students in an introductory proofs course were each interviewed three times in order to assess their proof schemes, understand how they think of specific mathematical concepts, and investigate how the students prove relationships between these concepts. This research used theoretical frameworks from both proof and definition literature. Findings show that students' ability or inability to adapt their concept images of the mathematical concepts enhanced and impeded their proof schemes, respectively.