Browsing by Author "Tignor, Keith R."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Behavior of wild-type and laboratory-adapted cabbage loopers, Tr̲ich̲o̲pl̲u̲s̲i̲a n̲i (Hübner) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae)Tignor, Keith R. (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1985)Three criteria, development, flight, and oviposition, were used to compare a laboratory-adapted and wild-type colony of Trichoolusia ni. The laboratory-adapted colony was further examined to determine the effect of larval crowding and starvation on the above criteria. The laboratory-adapted colony displayed a shorter development time and higher immature mortality than the wild-type colony. Differences in flight activity between and within the colonies were observed. Wild-type mated females were the most active group of tested moths. The oviposition rate of the laboratory-adapted colony was higher than the wild-type colony. Innate differences in parent populations and selective pressures during the rearing of the laboratory-adapted colony may explain differences between the colonies. Larval crowding resulted in prolonged development time, lower pupal weight, increased larval mortality, and increased adult longevity. Starvation during the larval stage produced similar changes. Flight activity declined with the degree of larval crowding and starvation. Larval crowding and starvation also resulted in a decline in adult fecundity and mating frequency. It is postulated that stress to the larvae resulted in a decline in energy sources to be used in the adult stage, producing docile adults.
- Biology and Management of Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) ColoniesRoth, Morgan A.; Wilson, James M.; Tignor, Keith R.; Gross, Aaron D. (Oxford University Press, 2020)Varroa mite (Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman) infestation of European honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies has been a growing cause of international concern among beekeepers throughout the last 50 yr. Varroa destructor spread from the Asian honey bee (Apis cerana Fabricius [Hymenoptera: Apidae]) to A. mellifera populations in Europe in the 1970s, and subsequently traveled to the Americas. In addition to causing damage through feeding upon lipids of larval and adult bees, V. destructor also facilitates the spread of several viruses, with deformed wing virus being most prevalent. Several sampling methods have been developed for estimating infestation levels of A. mellifera colonies, and acaricide treatments have been implemented. However, overuse of synthetic acaricides in the past has led to widespread acaricide resistant V. destructor populations. The application of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques is a more recent development in V. destructor control and is suggested to be more effective than only using pesticides, thereby posing fewer threats to A. mellifera colonies. When using IPM methods, informed management decisions are made based upon sampling, and cultural and mechanical controls are implemented prior to use of acaricide treatments. If acaricides are deemed necessary, they are rotated based on their mode of action, thus avoiding V. destructor resistance development.
- Methods for controlling two European Honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) pests: Varroa mites (Varroa destructor, Anderson and Trueman) And Small hive beetles (Aethina tumida)Roth, Morgan Alicia (Virginia Tech, 2019-06-11)Throughout the last five decades, European Honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies have been heavily damaged by invading Varroa mites (Varroa destructor), and, more recently, small hive beetles (Aethina tumida). These pests infest A. mellifera colonies throughout Virginia, with V. destructor feeding upon the lipids of their hosts and spreading viruses, and A. tumida feeding extensively on hive products and brood. Because V. destructor has historically demonstrated acaricide resistance, this study examined V. destructor resistance to three common acaricides (amitraz, coumaphos, and tau-fluvalinate) throughout the three geographic regions of Virginia using glass vial contact bioassays; the results showed no resistance in the sites tested. To gain better insights into A. tumida pharmacology, several known acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors and three novel insecticides (previously shown to have low mammalian toxicity) were tested against an A. tumida laboratory colony through in vivo and in vitro bioassays. The results of these bioassays indicated that coumaphos was most selective and topically effective against A. tumida, while only one experimental compound was selective against A. tumida, with 29-fold less potency than coumaphos. These results can help apiculturists in making informed pest management choices and can lead to future studies further examining V. destructor resistance and optimizing A. tumida insecticide treatments.