Browsing by Author "Tsapakis, Ioannis"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Autonomous Delivery Vehicle as a Disruptive Technology: How to Shape the Future with a Focus on Safety?Das, Subasish; Tsapakis, Ioannis; Wei, Zihang; Elgart, Zachary; Kutela, Boniphace; Vierkant, Valerie; Li, Eric (SAFE-D: Safety Through Disruption National University Transportation Center, 2022-09)The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recently granted permission to deploy low-speed autonomous delivery vehicles (ADVs) on roadways. Although the mobility of ADVs is limited to low-speed roads and these vehicles are occupantless, frequent stops and mobility among residential neighborhoods cause safety- related concerns. There is consequently a need for a comprehensive safety impact analysis of ADVs. This study examined the safety implications and safety impacts of ADVs by using novel approaches. This research prepared several datasets such as fatal crash data, aggregated ADV trips and trajectories, and real-world crash data from the scenario design for an ADV-related operational design domain. Association rules mining was applied to the datasets to identify significant patterns. This study generated a total of 80 association rules that provide risk patterns associated with ADVs. The rules can be used as prospective benchmarks to examine how rule-based risk patterns can be reduced by ADVs that replace human-driven trips.
- Developing AI-Driven Safe Navigation ToolDas, Subasish; Sohrabi, Soheil; Tsapakis, Ioannis; Ye, Xinyue; Weng, Yanmo; Li, Shoujia; Torbic, Darren (Safe-D University Transportation Center, 2023-09)Popular navigation applications such as Google Maps and Apple Maps provide distance-based or travel timebased alternative routes with no real-time risk scoring. There is a need for a real-time navigation system that can provide the data-driven decision on the safest path or route. By leveraging data from a diverse range of historical and real-time sources, this study successfully developed a user interface for a navigation tool or application that offers informed and data-driven decisions regarding the safest navigation options. The interface considers multiple scoring factors, including safety, distance, travel time, and an overall scoring metric. This study made a distinctive and valuable contribution by designing and implementing a robust safe navigation tool driven by artificial intelligence. Unlike existing navigation tools that offer multiple uninformed route options, this tool provides users with an informed decision on the safest route. By leveraging advanced AI algorithms and integrating various data sources, this navigation tool enhances the accuracy and reliability of route selection, thereby improving overall road safety and ensuring users can make informed decisions for their journeys.
- Use of Disruptive Technologies to Support Safety Analysis and Meet New Federal RequirementsTsapakis, Ioannis; Das, Subasish; Khodadadi, Ali; Lord, Dominique; Morris, Jessica; Li, Eric (SAFE-D: Safety Through Disruption National University Transportation Center, 2021-03)States are required to have access to annual average daily traffic (AADT) for all public paved roads, including non-federal aid system (NFAS) roadways. The expectation is to use AADT estimates in data-driven safety analysis. Because collecting data on NFAS roads is financially difficult, agencies are interested in exploring affordable ways to estimate AADT. The goal of this project was to determine the accuracy of AADT estimates developed from alternative data sources and quantify the impact of AADT on safety analysis. The researchers compared 2017 AADT data provided by the Texas and Virginia Departments of Transportation against probebased AADT estimates supplied by StreetLight Data Inc. Further, the research team developed safety performance functions (SPFs) for Texas and Virginia and performed a sensitivity analysis to determine the effects of AADT on the results obtained from the empirical Bayes method that uses SPFs. The results showed that the errors stemming from the probe AADT estimates were lower than those reported in a similar study that used 2015 AADT estimates. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the impact of AADT on safety analysis mainly depends on the size of the network, the AADT coefficients, and the overdispersion parameter of the SPFs.