VTechWorks staff will be away for the winter holidays starting Tuesday, December 24, 2024, through Wednesday, January 1, 2025, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thank you for your patience, and happy holidays!

Browsing by Author "van Ranst, E."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Participatory soil survey: Experience in working with a Mesoamerican indigenous community
    Barrera-Bassols, N.; Zinck, J. A.; van Ranst, E. (British Society of Soil Science, 2009)
    This article discusses a participatory approach to integrating scientific soil surveys and local soil surveys in designing conservation plans. The objective of this study was to collaborate with a local community to design a participatory resource soil map in the Purhepecha community of San Francisco Pichataro. The goal of the research was to understand local knowledge, beliefs, perceptions and management practices in soil, relating this knowledge to scientific soil maps. Methods used were a literature review of participatory soil survey studies. Methods for field research included ethnopedology and ethnographic research techniques, including a participatory soil survey, interviews, triad tests, soil questionnaire, soil profile descriptions, soil correlation monoliths, soil-landscape cross-sections, and resource mapping. Twenty-seven farmers (six were women) were interviewed. Results show that Pichartaro farmers have five central soil types: hard and sticky, powdery, clayey, and gravelly. Farmers described and classified soils based on color, texture, landscape position, stoniness,and organic matter concentration. When making soil taxonomies, farmers put all soils with other human and nonhuman beings, and then break them into the five major types and so forth. Results also show that farmers pass local soil knowledge through generations with community meetings, land management laws, and experience. Using GIS mapping, it was concluded that local farmers and scientists make very similar soil maps, which are based on soil and landscape (terrain) connections. However, local farmers also conceptualize soil and land properties based on land ownership, sense of place, and identity. From this collaboration, farmers and soil scientists were able to make a community-based land-use plan.
  • Symbolism, knowledge and management of soil and land resources in indigenous communities: Ethnopedology at global, regional and local scales
    Barrera-Bassols, N.; Zinck, J. A.; van Ranst, E. (Elsevier, 2006)
    This article explains the ethnoecological model or KCP complex. The KCP model integrates major domains used for understanding natural resource use and allocation: symbolic (Kosmos), cognitive (Corpus), and management (Praxis). Because the analysis addresses global, regional and local scales, Barrera-Bassols et al. were able to conclude that there was cross-culturally recognized criteria for KCP developed by indigenous communities regardless of location. The article specifically stresses the need to take local "cosmovision" approaches and results of interviews to gather local knowledge into account for planning and implementation of development programs in rural, agriculture-based areas.