Strategic Growth Area: Economical and Sustainable Materials (ESM)
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Strategic Growth Area: Economical and Sustainable Materials (ESM) by Department "Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Forest Certification Perspectives in the Wood Products Supply Chain in Virginia, U.S.A.Munsell, John F.; Ares, Adrian; Barrett, Scott M.; Bond, Brian H.; Gagnon, Jennifer L. (MDPI, 2017-09-26)Participation among private forest owners, logging contractors, and wood products manufacturers in the forest certification sector remains low. Those that enroll are mainly large-acreage owners and specialized manufacturers. Little is known about certification perspectives across the supply chain and how they relate. Comparing what owners, contractors, and manufacturers think about certification would increase insight regarding sector growth. In this study, 2,741 private forest owners, logging contractors, and wood products manufacturers in Virginia, U.S.A. were surveyed about their beliefs regarding the impact of certification on economic opportunities and image and the extent to which they think it positively affects the forestry sector and understand how to certify forestland. Co-orientation was used to map alignment and predictions between respondents. Owner and contractor responses were similar and predictions about each other mostly accurate, but manufacturer responses and predictions were largely incongruent. Manufacturers generally aligned more so with contractors than owners but contractors identified slightly more with owners. Owners and contractors shared perspectives and a discernable identity, whereas manufacturers viewed certification in a less positive light. Implications for participation in forest certification focus largely on interrelationships of actor perspectives regardless of scale and emphasize the roles each can play in the forest certification sector.
- Household Perceptions and Practices of Recycling Tree Debris from Residential PropertiesSchmitt-Harsh, Mikaela L.; Wiseman, P. Eric (MDPI, 2020-08-11)Thousands of trees are lost in urbanizing areas of Virginia each year to land development, storms, and pests. As a result, large amounts of tree debris, much of which could be suitable for high-value wood products, are flowing from Virginia’s urban forests annually. Finding cost-effective, sustainable strategies for recycling this debris, particularly into durable wood products that keep carbon stored, could benefit the local economy and the local environment throughout the state. To inform outreach and technical assistance efforts of multiple groups across the state, a survey study was conducted in the City of Harrisonburg to determine household perceptions and practices of tree debris recycling. A random sample of owner-occupied, single-family dwellings was contacted using a mixed-mode survey approach to determine why and how trees were removed from the properties in the past and how the debris was disposed of or recycled. Survey responses were received from 189 households, with survey responses pointing toward a strong community sentiment for trees and their care. Nearly all respondents agreed that wood from street trees, park trees, and other neighborhood trees should be recycled into products rather than disposed of in a landfill; however, the majority of households do not currently recycle woody debris from trees removed on these properties. The three most important factors that would facilitate future participation in tree recycling include timely removal of the wood, free curbside pick-up of the wood, and knowledge of who to contact to handle the wood. Overall, these results point to household interest and willingness to participate in wood recycling programs given appropriate information to guide their decisions and local services to facilitate transfer of wood to the municipality or commercial woodworkers. This suggests a need for greater availability of neighborhood or municipal wood recycling programs, ideally coupled with greater education and outreach about the economic and environmental benefits of recovering and utilizing wood from felled trees.
- Household survey of tree debris recycling practices and consumer interest in products crafted from local wood sourcesWiseman, P. Eric; Schmitt-Harsh, Mikaela L. (2019-03-01)Thousands of trees are lost in urban areas of Virginia each year to land development, storms, and pests. As a result, large volumes of tree debris, much of which is suitable for high-value wood products, are streaming out of Virginia’s urban forests annually. Finding cost-effective, sustainable strategies for recycling this waste, particularly into durable wood products that keep carbon stored indefinitely, could benefit the local economy and the local environment. To inform outreach and technical assistance efforts of the Virginia Urban Wood Group, we conducted a survey in the cities of Harrisonburg and Lynchburg, Virginia to determine household practices of tree debris recycling. A stratified random sample of owner-occupied, single-family dwelling units (1,000 households per city) were contacted by postal mail and asked to complete either a paper on online survey. We obtained survey responses from 311 households—187 in Harrisonburg and 113 in Lynchburg. Nearly all respondents strongly agreed (57%) or agreed (34%) with the statement, “Wood from street trees, park trees, and other neighborhood trees should be recycled into products rather than disposed of in a landfill.” The majority of respondents (68%) indicated that one or more trees had been removed during their time living on the property. However, 51% stated that they had not considered recycling wood from those trees. The two most important factors facilitating participation in tree recycling were timely removal of the wood (85% agreed) and free curbside pick-up of the wood (76% agreed). Implications of these and other survey findings are discussed.