Gonzalez, Juan J.; Bond, Brian H.; Quesada, Henry Jose (North Carolina State University, 2021-08-01)
Research indicates that users of thermally modified wood lack information regarding the improved performance and any variations that may exist for the “same” product when manufactured by different companies. The goal of this study was to evaluate the variability in mechanical properties of three thermally modified hardwoods and determine the variability between three different manufacturers. To determine the hardness, bending (modulus of elasticity and module of rupture) and shrinkage values, testing was conducted following ASTM standard D143. The samples were conditioned at 20 °C and a relative humidity of 65% until they reached an equilibrium moisture content before testing. Analysis of variance was used to determine the variability within and between the different processes used by each company. Seven out of 18 (39%) tests indicated that there were statistical differences regarding the mechanical performances of the wood samples. Yellow poplar had the least variation between companies (only difference in equilibrium moisture content, EMC) and red maple had the most (hardness, tangential shrinkage, and EMC). While the means for these properties were statistically different, the differences in application for hardness and EMC are slight. For example, the largest difference between processes in hardness was 83.6 kg, for tangential shrinkage, 0.45% and 1.37% for EMC. These differences are suggested to be inconsequential when compared to the values that exist between different species of untreated wood.