Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS)
    • Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise
    • Faculty Works, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS)
    • Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise
    • Faculty Works, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Exploring Community Gardens in a Health Disparate Population: Findings from a Mixed Methods Pilot Study

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Main article (1.401Mb)
    Downloads: 1625
    Date
    2012
    Author
    Zanko, Ashley
    Price, Bryan
    Bonner, Jennifer
    Hill, Jennie L.
    Zoellner, Jamie M.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Despite recommendations, there have been few efforts to apply the community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach in the development, implementation, and evaluation of community gardens. Objectives: As guided by the CBPR approach and grounded in a social-ecological model and behavioral theory, the purpose of this mixed methods study was to understand opinions and interests in developing and implementing a community garden and to understand factors impacting fruit, vegetable, and gardening behaviors. Methods: Community and academic members collaborated to develop and execute this study. The qualitative phase- targeting regional key informants-was designed to elicit perceived benefits and challenges of community gardens at the environmental, community, and individual levels. The quantitative phase targeted low resourced youth and parents and included a variety of validated theory-based questionnaires to understand factors impacting fruit, vegetable, and gardening behaviors. Results: Major benefits of community gardens that emerged from the 10 qualitative interviews included increasing community cohesion and improving nutrition and physical activity factors. The quantitative phase included 87 youth and 67 parents. Across 16 items for fruits and vegetables, the average willingness to try was 1.32 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.40) on a 2-point scale. The majority of youth indicated they would work in a garden (n = 59; 68%) and eat food grown in their garden (n = 71; 82%). Among parents, gardening attitude, belief, and self-efficacy scores were all above average; however, gardening intentions were neutral. Conclusion: This research illustrates the successful partnering a community-academic team and has provided the partnership with a clearer lens to conceptualize and launch future regional community garden efforts.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/25469
    Collections
    • Faculty Works, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise [208]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us