Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Engineering (COE)
    • Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • Scholarly Works, Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Engineering (COE)
    • Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • Scholarly Works, Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S12, noise

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    1996_Development_new_standard_laboratory_protocol.pdf (422.7Kb)
    Downloads: 597
    Date
    1996-03-01
    Author
    Royster, Julia D.
    Berger, Elliott H.
    Merry, Carol J.
    Nixon, Charles W.
    Franks, John R.
    Behar, Alberto
    Casali, John G.
    Dixon-Ernst, Christine
    Kieper, Ronald W.
    Mozo, Ben T.
    Ohlin, Doug
    Royster, Larry H.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper describes research conducted by Working Group 11 of Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise, to develop procedures to estimate the field performance of hearing protection devices (HPDs). Current standardized test methods overestimate the attenuation achieved by workers in everyday use on the job. The goal was to approximate the amount of attenuation that can be achieved by noise-exposed populations in well-managed real-world hearing conservation programs, while maintaining acceptable interlaboratory measurement variability. S12/WG11 designed two new laboratory-based protocols for measuring real-ear attenuation at threshold, with explicit procedures for subject selection, training, supervision, and HPD fitting. After pilot-testing, S12/WG11 conducted a full-scale study of three types of earplugs and one earmuff tested by four independent laboratories using both protocols. The protocol designated as ''subject-fit'' assessed the attenuation achieved by subjects who were experienced in threshold audiometry, but naive with respect to the use of hearing protection, when they fit HPDs by following manufacturers' instructions without any experimenter assistance. The attenuation results from the subject-fit method corresponded more closely to real-world data than results from the other protocol tested, which allowed the experimenter to coach subjects in HPD use, Comparisons of interlaboratory measurement variability for the subject-fit procedure to previous interlaboratory studies using other protocols indicated that the measurements with the new procedure are at least as reproducible as those obtained with existing standardized methods. Therefore, the subject-fit protocol was selected for consideration for use in future revisions of HPD attenuation test standards. Copyright 1996 Acoustical Society of America.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/52273
    Collections
    • Scholarly Works, Industrial and Systems Engineering [240]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us