VTechWorks staff will be away for the Thanksgiving holiday starting at noon on Wednesday, November 21, through Friday, November 23, and will not be replying to requests during this time. Thanks for your patience, and happy holidays!
Payment is good, control is better: why payments for forest environmental services in Vietnam have so far remained incipient
|dc.description||Metadata only record|
|dc.description.abstract||The study discusses the types of PES and PES-like initiatives that have been implemented in Vietnam. The authors summarize both the achievements and challenges for using PES in Vietnam based on review and analysis of current projects. They found numerous PES-like schemes, but concluded that no full PES initiatives have been implemented, according to their definition of "the PES principle". The identified reasons for this are 1) a lack of land-use decision-making power among landholder (due to state control of forest land use), 2) a lack of conditionality for receiving payments, and 3) inadequate funding to cover opportunity cost of alternative uses.|
|dc.publisher||Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR|
|dc.rights||Copyright 2005 by CIFOR. All rights reserved.|
|dc.subject||Payments for environmental services|
|dc.subject||Land use management|
|dc.title||Payment is good, control is better: why payments for forest environmental services in Vietnam have so far remained incipient|
|dc.description.notes||PES-1 (Payments for Environmental Services Associate Award)|
Files in this item
There are no files associated with this item.