Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments

TR Number
Date
2006
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract

For far too long, conservation scientists and practitioners have depended on intuition and anecdote to guide the design of conservation investments. If we want to ensure that our limited resources make a difference, we must accept that testing hypotheses about what policies protect biological diversity requires the same scientific rigor and state-of-the-art methods that we invest in testing ecological hypotheses. Our understanding of the ecological aspects of ecosystem conservation rests, in part, on well-designed empirical studies. In contrast, our understanding of the way in which policies can prevent species loss and ecosystem degradation rests primarily on case-study narratives from field initiatives that are not designed to answer the question "Does the intervention work better than no intervention at all?"

Description
Keywords
Research planning, Payments for environmental services, Program planning, Conservation strategy, Conservation planning, Conservation, Biodiversity conservation, Program evaluation, Conservation investments, Conservation interventions, Empirical analysis, Monitoring, Counterfactual outcomes
Citation
PLoS Biology 4(4): 482-488