Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments
Ferraro, Paul J.
MetadataShow full item record
For far too long, conservation scientists and practitioners have depended on intuition and anecdote to guide the design of conservation investments. If we want to ensure that our limited resources make a difference, we must accept that testing hypotheses about what policies protect biological diversity requires the same scientific rigor and state-of-the-art methods that we invest in testing ecological hypotheses. Our understanding of the ecological aspects of ecosystem conservation rests, in part, on well-designed empirical studies. In contrast, our understanding of the way in which policies can prevent species loss and ecosystem degradation rests primarily on case-study narratives from field initiatives that are not designed to answer the question "Does the intervention work better than no intervention at all?"
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Developing optimum level of soil nutrient management for maize in conservation agriculture production system (CAPS) Mercado, Agustin R., Jr.; Edralin, Don Immanuel; Arcinal, Gil A.; Reyes, Manuel R. (2014)Maie is the main staple crop in the conservation agriculture production system in this acid upland soil where it is traditionally grown twice a year. Appropriate fertility management is important so that optimum yield and ...
Harsch, E.; Philipose, L.; Munyakho, D.; Munyakho, S.; Sawadogo, J.M.; Sawadogo, M. (1995)A collection of seven papers examining the action of a number of communities throughout Africa to halt environmental degradation and conserve their local environmental resources. The first paper (Harsch, pp.2-7,40) examines ...
Zurita, P. (2005)This presentation describes the concept of conservation incentive agreements (CIAs) and discusses the case study of Guyana. Additionally, the Conservation Stewards Program, another PES-type initiative, and CIFOR's PES water ...