Virginia Tech
    • Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS)
    • Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebase
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS)
    • Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebase
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Conservation agriculture and soil carbon sequestration: Between myth and farmer reality

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2009
    Author
    Govaerts, Bram
    Verhulst, N.
    Castellanos-Navarrete, A.
    Sayre, Ken D.
    Dixon, John
    Dendooven, L.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Improving food security, environmental preservation and enhancing livelihood should be the main targets of the innovators of today's farming systems. Conservation agriculture (CA), based on minimum tillage, crop residue retention, and crop rotations, has been proposed as an alternative system combining benefits for the farmer with advantages for the society. This paper reviews the potential impact of CA on C sequestration by synthesizing the knowledge of carbon and nitrogen cycling in agriculture; summarizing the influence of tillage, residue management, and crop rotation on soil organic carbon stocks; and compiling the existing case study information. To evaluate the C sequestration capacity of farming practices, their influence on emissions from farming activities should be considered together with their influence on soil C stocks. The largest contribution of CA to reducing emissions from farming activities is made by the reduction of tillage operations. The soil C case study results are not conclusive. In 7 of the 78 cases withheld, the soil C stock was lower in zero compared to conventional tillage, in 40 cases it was higher, and in 31 of the cases there was no significant difference. The mechanisms that govern the balance between increased or no sequestration after conversion to zero tillage are not clear, although some factors that play a role can be distinguished, e.g., root development and rhizodeposits, baseline soil C content, bulk density and porosity, climate, landscape position, and erosion/deposition history. Altering crop rotation can influence soil C stocks by changing quantity and quality of organic matter input. More research is needed, especially in the tropical areas where good quantitative information is lacking. However, even if C sequestration is questionable in some areas and cropping systems, CA remains an important technology that improves soil processes, controls soil erosion and reduces production cost. (CabAbstracts)
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/69126
    Collections
    • Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebase [3994]

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us