• Log in
    View Item 
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS)
    • Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebase
    • View Item
    •   VTechWorks Home
    • College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS)
    • Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebase
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Projection of aggregate and farm benefits of conservation agriculture productions systems using economic surplus analysis and linear programing in Nepal

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    7411_IFAMA_presentation_presented.pdf (6.115Mb)
    Downloads: 554
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Paudel, B.
    Chan-Halbrendt, Catherine
    Nguema, A.
    Norton, George W.
    Tamang, Bishal B.
    T.J.K. Radovich
    Crow, S.
    Halbrendt, Jacqueline
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Traditional agriculture in central mid hills of Nepal is characterized by cultivation of sloping lands, resulting in lower productivity and soil loss. The Sustainable Management of Agro-ecological Resources in Tribal Societies (SMARTS) project applied a participatory agro-ecological research framework to develop improved conservation agriculture practices system (CAPS) to contribute to sustainable livelihood of marginalized tribal farmers. This paper used economic surplus analysis at macro level to analyze the effect of adoption of adoption of different CAPS by farmers on aggregate benefits. The paper also used farm level linear programming model to estimate the revenue maximization allocation of the land for a representative households. The result indicated adoption of CAPS 2 (i.e. maize in first season followed by cowpea cover crop) increased the aggregate economic surplus but adoption of CAPS 3 and CAPS 4 did not increase the economic surplus. At farm level profit maximization model showed, when the soil loss is not considered, adoption of CAPS 1 on all land produced maximum revenue. Under the scenario build with maximum soil loss of 1 ton ha-1 year-1, adoption of CAPS 4 (maize followed by millet+cowpea intercrop with strip tillage) on 61% of land, CAPS 2 on 34% of land and CAPS 3 on 4% (maize followed by millet+cowpea intercrop with conventional tillage) was profit maximizing. Farmers can increase farm revenue and profit by adopting either of the scenarios.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10919/70200
    Collections
    • Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management (SANREM) Knowledgebase [4061]

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      2nd East Africa Regional Workshop Report: Conservation Agriculture in AFRICA - Analysing and Foreseeing its Impact - Comprehending its Adoption 

      Apina, T.; Mkomwa, S.; Mutai, W.; Njeri, A. (CA2Africa, 2011)
      This resource provides a summary of the 2nd East Africa Sub-regional workshop held in Nanyuki, Kenya, on 28-30 March 2011. Attendees included the African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT), Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility ...
    • Thumbnail

      CAPS options for Tentuli Village 

      Idol, Travis; Chan-Halbrendt, Catherine; T.J.K. Radovich (Honolulu HI: College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, 2011)
      This presentation uses the results of soil and agronomic data analysis to make recommendations for CAPS options in Tentuli Village, India.
    • Thumbnail

      DMC development in Cambodia: A tool for economic and territory development 

      Boulakia, Stephane (2010)
      This presentation calls for a comprehensive plan for future development to protect the natural resources and promote agricultural and rural development in Cambodia. For development to be beneficial, it is important to ...

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us
     

     

    VTechWorks

    AboutPoliciesHelp

    Browse

    All of VTechWorksCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Log inRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    If you believe that any material in VTechWorks should be removed, please see our policy and procedure for Requesting that Material be Amended or Removed. All takedown requests will be promptly acknowledged and investigated.

    Virginia Tech | University Libraries | Contact Us