A Study to Determine the Preference for Nesting Box Design of Sialia sialis (Eastern Bluebird): Comparison of the Traditional Nesting Box and the Peterson Box, Year 2

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBurkart, Carol A.en
dc.contributor.authorRusso, Anthonyen
dc.contributor.authorMeade, C.en
dc.contributor.authorHubbard, D.en
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, C.en
dc.contributor.authorYates, T.en
dc.contributor.authorLipps, H.en
dc.contributor.authorLambert, E.en
dc.contributor.authorMoles, C.en
dc.contributor.authorFlanary, K.en
dc.contributor.authorHead, S.en
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, D.en
dc.contributor.authorEngle, C.en
dc.contributor.authorHuneycutt, A.en
dc.contributor.authorO’Quinn, L.en
dc.contributor.authorOwens, L.en
dc.contributor.authorSteele, M.en
dc.contributor.authorReinhard, J.en
dc.contributor.authorMaine, A.en
dc.contributor.authorDean, C.en
dc.contributor.authorCroley, F.en
dc.contributor.authorGaiger, C.en
dc.contributor.authorYounce, T.en
dc.contributor.authorBourn, A.en
dc.contributor.authorShort, M.en
dc.contributor.authorMullins, S.en
dc.contributor.authorFields, A.en
dc.contributor.authorStidham, A.en
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, D.en
dc.contributor.authorGreen, K.en
dc.contributor.authorNash, A.en
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Z.en
dc.contributor.authorTate, H.en
dc.contributor.authorDeBoard, M.en
dc.contributor.authorAdams, A.en
dc.contributor.authorKern, S.en
dc.contributor.authorTurner, T.en
dc.contributor.authorGreer, C.en
dc.contributor.authorBeaver, W.en
dc.contributor.departmentPowell River Projecten
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-01T16:28:31Zen
dc.date.available2021-04-01T16:28:31Zen
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.description.abstractThe 2013 nesting season was the second year comparing the Peterson box to the traditional rectangular blue bird nesting box. Peterson boxes have a lower internal volume, requiring less material and parental effort for nest construction. It has been suggested that by freeing up energy for rearing young, fledging success could be improved over that of the traditional box. As during the previous season, bluebirds, tree swallows and chickadees utilized the Peterson boxes. However, unlike the 2012 season, more nests were built in Peterson boxes than in the traditional boxes. Of the 11 nests built in Peterson boxes, eggs were laid in 8 boxes of which only 4 successfully fledged chicks. Eggs or chicks were lost to predators from 3 of the Peterson boxes, while one clutch of 3 chicks was found dead in the nest. Five nests were built in traditional boxes, of which three fledged chicks. Hatching and fledging success were higher for eggs laid in traditional boxes than in the Peterson boxes. However, the paucity of clutches (2 of the 3 clutches in traditional boxes were in the same box) makes it difficult to draw a conclusion about hatching of fledging success. Student volunteers from both the general biology and human anatomy and physiology classes at Mountain Empire Community College assisted in the monitoring of nesting activity during the course of the breeding season, as well as maintenance along the trail.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10919/102918en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVirginia Tech. Powell River Projecten
dc.rightsIn Copyright (InC)en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en
dc.titleA Study to Determine the Preference for Nesting Box Design of Sialia sialis (Eastern Bluebird): Comparison of the Traditional Nesting Box and the Peterson Box, Year 2en
dc.typeReporten
dc.type.dcmitypeTexten
dc.type.dcmitypeStillImageen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BurkartStudy2013.pdf
Size:
228.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Reports, Powell River Project